Shaohua Li writes:
>> Also, Jens or Shaohua or anyone, please review my blk-mq plug fix (patch
>> 1/2 of aforementioned thread). ;)
>
> You are not alone :), I posted 2 times too
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=142627559617005=2
Oh, sorry! I think Jens had mentioned that you had a patch
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 04:54:40PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Shaohua Li writes:
>
> > Current code looks like inner plug gets flushed with a
> > blk_finish_plug(). Actually it's a nop. All requests/callbacks are added
> > to current->plug, while only outmost plug is assigned to current->plug.
>
Shaohua Li writes:
> Current code looks like inner plug gets flushed with a
> blk_finish_plug(). Actually it's a nop. All requests/callbacks are added
> to current->plug, while only outmost plug is assigned to current->plug.
> So inner plug always has empty request/callback list, which makes
>
Shaohua Li s...@fb.com writes:
Current code looks like inner plug gets flushed with a
blk_finish_plug(). Actually it's a nop. All requests/callbacks are added
to current-plug, while only outmost plug is assigned to current-plug.
So inner plug always has empty request/callback list, which
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 04:54:40PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Shaohua Li s...@fb.com writes:
Current code looks like inner plug gets flushed with a
blk_finish_plug(). Actually it's a nop. All requests/callbacks are added
to current-plug, while only outmost plug is assigned to current-plug.
Shaohua Li s...@fb.com writes:
Also, Jens or Shaohua or anyone, please review my blk-mq plug fix (patch
1/2 of aforementioned thread). ;)
You are not alone :), I posted 2 times too
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=142627559617005w=2
Oh, sorry! I think Jens had mentioned that you had a
Current code looks like inner plug gets flushed with a
blk_finish_plug(). Actually it's a nop. All requests/callbacks are added
to current->plug, while only outmost plug is assigned to current->plug.
So inner plug always has empty request/callback list, which makes
blk_flush_plug_list() a nop.
Current code looks like inner plug gets flushed with a
blk_finish_plug(). Actually it's a nop. All requests/callbacks are added
to current-plug, while only outmost plug is assigned to current-plug.
So inner plug always has empty request/callback list, which makes
blk_flush_plug_list() a nop. This
8 matches
Mail list logo