On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Wang YanQing wrote:
> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* bpf_jit.S : BPF JIT helper functions
Please do not add these file names to the top level comment. They provide
no value and just become stale when the file gets moved/renamed.
> + *
> + *
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Wang YanQing wrote:
> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* bpf_jit.S : BPF JIT helper functions
Please do not add these file names to the top level comment. They provide
no value and just become stale when the file gets moved/renamed.
> + *
> + *
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 05:31:18PM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> The JIT compiler emits ia32 bit instructions. Currently, It supports
> eBPF only. Classic BPF is supported because of the conversion by BPF core.
>
> Almost all instructions from eBPF ISA supported except the following:
> BPF_ALU64 |
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 05:31:18PM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> The JIT compiler emits ia32 bit instructions. Currently, It supports
> eBPF only. Classic BPF is supported because of the conversion by BPF core.
>
> Almost all instructions from eBPF ISA supported except the following:
> BPF_ALU64 |
The JIT compiler emits ia32 bit instructions. Currently, It supports
eBPF only. Classic BPF is supported because of the conversion by BPF core.
Almost all instructions from eBPF ISA supported except the following:
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K
The JIT compiler emits ia32 bit instructions. Currently, It supports
eBPF only. Classic BPF is supported because of the conversion by BPF core.
Almost all instructions from eBPF ISA supported except the following:
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X
BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K
6 matches
Mail list logo