> But you are getting familiarized, you sent a patch, got feedback, defend
> your patches. That's a great start, but it does not mean that the
> patches end up merged. The decision is up to the maintainer(s) of the
> subsystem.
>
> Nobody will bite your head off if you do some trivial formal
> But you are getting familiarized, you sent a patch, got feedback, defend
> your patches. That's a great start, but it does not mean that the
> patches end up merged. The decision is up to the maintainer(s) of the
> subsystem.
>
> Nobody will bite your head off if you do some trivial formal
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:10:56AM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> > in short, whitespace-only changes do not help too much.
>
> But they are encouraged for people who would like to get started with kernel
> programming, Linus
> himself says so. In the future I plan on giving more, but I wanted to
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 06:10:56AM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> > in short, whitespace-only changes do not help too much.
>
> But they are encouraged for people who would like to get started with kernel
> programming, Linus
> himself says so. In the future I plan on giving more, but I wanted to
> in short, whitespace-only changes do not help too much.
But they are encouraged for people who would like to get started with kernel
programming, Linus
himself says so. In the future I plan on giving more, but I wanted to get
familiarized with the
process. So I still think this should be
> in short, whitespace-only changes do not help too much.
But they are encouraged for people who would like to get started with kernel
programming, Linus
himself says so. In the future I plan on giving more, but I wanted to get
familiarized with the
process. So I still think this should be
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:17:38PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Please read the answers from Filipe or me
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/53421
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/53422
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:17:38PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Please read the answers from Filipe or me
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/53421
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/53422
I apologize, I had my text editor set to a 4 space tab instead of 8 so I
couldn't see this clearly. That's fixed now, and it won't happen again.
Is this what you wanted? It seems to line up exactly like you proposed.
On 02/20/2016 08:06 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
checkpatch.pl reported a
I apologize, I had my text editor set to a 4 space tab instead of 8 so I
couldn't see this clearly. That's fixed now, and it won't happen again.
Is this what you wanted? It seems to line up exactly like you proposed.
On 02/20/2016 08:06 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
checkpatch.pl reported a
checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Adjusted to put and on a different line
Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Adjusted to put and on a different line
Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 18:57 -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Better?
No, not really.
The alignment should be to the open parenthesis
as I wrote in the first reply.
> On 02/20/2016 06:56 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
> > checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
> >
> >
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 18:57 -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Better?
No, not really.
The alignment should be to the open parenthesis
as I wrote in the first reply.
> On 02/20/2016 06:56 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
> > checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
> >
> >
Better?
On 02/20/2016 06:56 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Adjusted to put and on a different line
Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Adjusted to put and on a different line
Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
Better?
On 02/20/2016 06:56 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Adjusted to put and on a different line
Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Adjusted to put and on a different line
Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 12:17 -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
[]
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
[]
> @@ -1830,7 +1830,11 @@ static int iterate_inode_extrefs(u64 inum, struct
> btrfs_root *fs_root,
>
On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 12:17 -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
[]
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
[]
> @@ -1830,7 +1830,11 @@ static int iterate_inode_extrefs(u64 inum, struct
> btrfs_root *fs_root,
>
checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Fixed by splitting up into multiple lines, no build errors afterwards
Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Fixed by splitting up into multiple lines, no build errors afterwards
Signed-off-by: Simon Quigley
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Fixed by splitting up into multiple lines, no build errors afterwards
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index f6dac40..d09
checkpatch.pl reported a warning of over 80 characters on line 1833
Fixed by splitting up into multiple lines, no build errors afterwards
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index f6dac40..d09
24 matches
Mail list logo