Setting aggressive=1 bypasses the friendly auto-detection by polling the status
register, and instead attempts to initialize the qcam directly. Not friendly to
other parallel devices, but much more reliable than the auto-detection.
Signed-off-by: Brett T. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Setting aggressive=1 bypasses the friendly auto-detection by polling the status
register, and instead attempts to initialize the qcam directly. Not friendly to
other parallel devices, but much more reliable than the auto-detection.
Signed-off-by: Brett T. Warden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Sorry, forgot to copy back to the lists.
On Dec 5, 2007 8:49 AM, Brett Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 4:46 PM, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Someone still has a bw-qcam device ?
>
> Yes. I haven't found a better option for very-low-light, although I
> admit I
Sorry, forgot to copy back to the lists.
On Dec 5, 2007 8:49 AM, Brett Warden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007 4:46 PM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone still has a bw-qcam device ?
Yes. I haven't found a better option for very-low-light, although I
admit I haven't looked
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:44:41 -0800
"Brett T. Warden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Setting aggressive=1 bypasses the friendly auto-detection by polling the
> status register, and instead attempts to initialize the qcam directly. Not
> friendly to other parallel devices, but much more reliable
Setting aggressive=1 bypasses the friendly auto-detection by polling the status
register, and instead attempts to initialize the qcam directly. Not friendly to
other parallel devices, but much more reliable than the auto-detection.
Signed-off-by: Brett T. Warden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Setting aggressive=1 bypasses the friendly auto-detection by polling the status
register, and instead attempts to initialize the qcam directly. Not friendly to
other parallel devices, but much more reliable than the auto-detection.
Signed-off-by: Brett T. Warden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:44:41 -0800
Brett T. Warden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setting aggressive=1 bypasses the friendly auto-detection by polling the
status register, and instead attempts to initialize the qcam directly. Not
friendly to other parallel devices, but much more reliable than the
8 matches
Mail list logo