On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 13:40 +, David Howells wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Are you willing to take this between merge windows - or does it need
> to wait for the next merge window? It's not technically a bug fix to
> the kernel, but it does have a CVE attached to it.
>
> Note that I've also updated
David Howells wrote:
> This fixes CVE-2020-26541.
Note that I added the CVE number, not Eric.
David
Hi Linus,
Are you willing to take this between merge windows - or does it need to wait
for the next merge window? It's not technically a bug fix to the kernel, but
it does have a CVE attached to it.
Note that I've also updated Jarkko's address in his Reviewed-by since his
Intel address no longer
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 6:59 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:51:43PM -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>> The Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database, dbx, contains a list of now
>> revoked signatures and keys previously approved to boot with UEFI Secure
>> Boot enabled. T
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:51:43PM -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> The Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database, dbx, contains a list of now
> revoked signatures and keys previously approved to boot with UEFI Secure
> Boot enabled. The dbx is capable of containing any number of
> EFI_CERT_X509_SHA25
The Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database, dbx, contains a list of now
revoked signatures and keys previously approved to boot with UEFI Secure
Boot enabled. The dbx is capable of containing any number of
EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GUID, EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID, and EFI_CERT_X509_GUID
entries.
Currentl
6 matches
Mail list logo
