> On Sep 12, 2023, at 4:47 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 17:11 +, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 12, 2023, at 5:54 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 02:00 +, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2023, at 5:08 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 17:11 +, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>
> > On Sep 12, 2023, at 5:54 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 02:00 +, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sep 11, 2023, at 5:08 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 2023-09-11 at 22:17 +, Eric Snowberg
> On Sep 12, 2023, at 5:54 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 02:00 +, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2023, at 5:08 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2023-09-11 at 22:17 +, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2023, at 10:51 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 02:00 +, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>
> > On Sep 11, 2023, at 5:08 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2023-09-11 at 22:17 +, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sep 11, 2023, at 10:51 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:29:07AM -0400,
On Sat Sep 9, 2023 at 12:34 AM EEST, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> Currently root can dynamically update the blacklist keyring if the hash
> being added is signed and vouched for by the builtin trusted keyring.
> Currently keys in the secondary trusted keyring can not be used.
>
> Keys within the
On Mon Sep 11, 2023 at 4:29 PM EEST, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 17:34 -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> > Currently root can dynamically update the blacklist keyring if the hash
> > being added is signed and vouched for by the builtin trusted keyring.
> > Currently keys in
> On Sep 11, 2023, at 5:08 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2023-09-11 at 22:17 +, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2023, at 10:51 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:29:07AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 17:34
On Mon, 2023-09-11 at 22:17 +, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>
> > On Sep 11, 2023, at 10:51 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:29:07AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >> Hi Eric,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 17:34 -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> >>> Currently root can
> On Sep 11, 2023, at 4:04 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> On Mon Sep 11, 2023 at 4:29 PM EEST, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 17:34 -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>>> Currently root can dynamically update the blacklist keyring if the hash
>>> being added is signed and
> On Sep 11, 2023, at 10:51 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:29:07AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 17:34 -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>>> Currently root can dynamically update the blacklist keyring if the hash
>>> being added is signed
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 17:34 -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> Currently root can dynamically update the blacklist keyring if the hash
> being added is signed and vouched for by the builtin trusted keyring.
> Currently keys in the secondary trusted keyring can not be used.
>
> Keys within
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:29:07AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 17:34 -0400, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> > Currently root can dynamically update the blacklist keyring if the hash
> > being added is signed and vouched for by the builtin trusted keyring.
> > Currently
12 matches
Mail list logo