Re: [PATCH] clk: ingenic: Fix recalc_rate for clocks with fixed divider

2016-12-08 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 11/01, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Previously, the clocks with a fixed divider would report their rate > as being the same as the one of their parent, independently of the > divider in use. This commit fixes this behaviour. > > This went unnoticed as neither the jz4740 nor the jz4780 CGU code >

Re: [PATCH] clk: ingenic: Fix recalc_rate for clocks with fixed divider

2016-12-08 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 11/01, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Previously, the clocks with a fixed divider would report their rate > as being the same as the one of their parent, independently of the > divider in use. This commit fixes this behaviour. > > This went unnoticed as neither the jz4740 nor the jz4780 CGU code >

[PATCH] clk: ingenic: Fix recalc_rate for clocks with fixed divider

2016-11-01 Thread Paul Cercueil
Previously, the clocks with a fixed divider would report their rate as being the same as the one of their parent, independently of the divider in use. This commit fixes this behaviour. This went unnoticed as neither the jz4740 nor the jz4780 CGU code have clocks with fixed dividers yet.

[PATCH] clk: ingenic: Fix recalc_rate for clocks with fixed divider

2016-11-01 Thread Paul Cercueil
Previously, the clocks with a fixed divider would report their rate as being the same as the one of their parent, independently of the divider in use. This commit fixes this behaviour. This went unnoticed as neither the jz4740 nor the jz4780 CGU code have clocks with fixed dividers yet.