Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Fix missing 0 index in kill loop

2016-05-19 Thread Michal Marek
Dne 17.5.2016 v 16:33 Julia Lawall napsal(a): > > > On Tue, 17 May 2016, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote: > >> Le 16/05/16 14:55, Kees Cook a écrit : >>> By default, "seq" counts from 1, but processes were starting counting >>> from 0, so when interrupted, coccicheck would leave the 0th process >>>

Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Fix missing 0 index in kill loop

2016-05-19 Thread Michal Marek
Dne 17.5.2016 v 16:33 Julia Lawall napsal(a): > > > On Tue, 17 May 2016, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote: > >> Le 16/05/16 14:55, Kees Cook a écrit : >>> By default, "seq" counts from 1, but processes were starting counting >>> from 0, so when interrupted, coccicheck would leave the 0th process >>>

Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Fix missing 0 index in kill loop

2016-05-17 Thread Nicolas Palix (LIG)
Le 16/05/16 14:55, Kees Cook a écrit : > By default, "seq" counts from 1, but processes were starting counting > from 0, so when interrupted, coccicheck would leave the 0th process > running. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Acked-by: Nicolas Palix >

Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Fix missing 0 index in kill loop

2016-05-17 Thread Nicolas Palix (LIG)
Le 16/05/16 14:55, Kees Cook a écrit : > By default, "seq" counts from 1, but processes were starting counting > from 0, so when interrupted, coccicheck would leave the 0th process > running. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Acked-by: Nicolas Palix > --- > scripts/coccicheck | 2 +- > 1 file

Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Fix missing 0 index in kill loop

2016-05-17 Thread Julia Lawall
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote: > Le 16/05/16 14:55, Kees Cook a écrit : > > By default, "seq" counts from 1, but processes were starting counting > > from 0, so when interrupted, coccicheck would leave the 0th process > > running. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook

Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Fix missing 0 index in kill loop

2016-05-17 Thread Julia Lawall
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote: > Le 16/05/16 14:55, Kees Cook a écrit : > > By default, "seq" counts from 1, but processes were starting counting > > from 0, so when interrupted, coccicheck would leave the 0th process > > running. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > > Acked-by:

[PATCH] coccicheck: Fix missing 0 index in kill loop

2016-05-16 Thread Kees Cook
By default, "seq" counts from 1, but processes were starting counting from 0, so when interrupted, coccicheck would leave the 0th process running. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook --- scripts/coccicheck | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[PATCH] coccicheck: Fix missing 0 index in kill loop

2016-05-16 Thread Kees Cook
By default, "seq" counts from 1, but processes were starting counting from 0, so when interrupted, coccicheck would leave the 0th process running. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook --- scripts/coccicheck | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/coccicheck