On 4 February 2013 17:52, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 31 January 2013 07:56, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> With the recent changes in cpufreq core, we just need to set mask of all
>> possible cpus into policy->cpus. Rest would be done by core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
>> ---
>>
On 4 February 2013 17:52, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 31 January 2013 07:56, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
With the recent changes in cpufreq core, we just need to set mask of all
possible cpus into policy-cpus. Rest would be done by core.
Signed-off-by:
On 31 January 2013 07:56, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> With the recent changes in cpufreq core, we just need to set mask of all
> possible cpus into policy->cpus. Rest would be done by core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 14 +-
> 1 file changed,
On 31 January 2013 07:56, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
With the recent changes in cpufreq core, we just need to set mask of all
possible cpus into policy-cpus. Rest would be done by core.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
On 31 January 2013 10:22, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> With the recent changes in cpufreq core, we just need to set mask of all
> possible cpus into policy->cpus. Rest would be done by core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
Oops! Sent the wrong patch again. Ignore this mail :)
--
To unsubscribe from
With the recent changes in cpufreq core, we just need to set mask of all
possible cpus into policy->cpus. Rest would be done by core.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git
With the recent changes in cpufreq core, we just need to set mask of all
possible cpus into policy-cpus. Rest would be done by core.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff
On 31 January 2013 10:22, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
With the recent changes in cpufreq core, we just need to set mask of all
possible cpus into policy-cpus. Rest would be done by core.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
Oops! Sent the wrong patch again.
8 matches
Mail list logo