On Sunday, August 26, 2018 9:37:09 PM CEST Doug Smythies wrote:
> On 2018.08.25 04:22 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:52 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
> >> On 2018.08.24 02:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:44:10 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
On Sunday, August 26, 2018 9:37:09 PM CEST Doug Smythies wrote:
> On 2018.08.25 04:22 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:52 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
> >> On 2018.08.24 02:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:44:10 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
On 2018.08.25 04:22 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:52 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>> On 2018.08.24 02:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:44:10 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
The case addressed by commit
On 2018.08.25 04:22 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:52 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>> On 2018.08.24 02:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:44:10 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
The case addressed by commit
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:52 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>
> On 2018.08.24 02:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:44:10 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >>
> >> The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
> >> stopped
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:52 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>
> On 2018.08.24 02:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:44:10 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >>
> >> The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
> >> stopped
On 2018.08.24 02:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:44:10 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>
>> The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
>> stopped tick more aggressively) in the stopped tick case is present
>> when
On 2018.08.24 02:44 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:44:10 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>
>> The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
>> stopped tick more aggressively) in the stopped tick case is present
>> when
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:44:10 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
> stopped tick more aggressively) in the stopped tick case is present
> when the tick has not been stopped yet too. Namely, if
On Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:44:10 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
> stopped tick more aggressively) in the stopped tick case is present
> when the tick has not been stopped yet too. Namely, if
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:02 PM wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:44:10AM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
> > stopped tick more aggressively) in the stopped tick case is present
> > when the
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:02 PM wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:44:10AM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
> > stopped tick more aggressively) in the stopped tick case is present
> > when the
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 08:02:00PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
[...]
> > + if (!tick_nohz_tick_stopped()) {
> > + /*
> > +* If the state selected so far is shallow,
> > +* waking up early won't hurt, so
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 08:02:00PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
[...]
> > + if (!tick_nohz_tick_stopped()) {
> > + /*
> > +* If the state selected so far is shallow,
> > +* waking up early won't hurt, so
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:44:10AM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
> stopped tick more aggressively) in the stopped tick case is present
> when the tick has not been stopped yet too. Namely, if only
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:44:10AM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
> stopped tick more aggressively) in the stopped tick case is present
> when the tick has not been stopped yet too. Namely, if only
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
stopped tick more aggressively) in the stopped tick case is present
when the tick has not been stopped yet too. Namely, if only two CPU
idle states, shallow state A with target residency significantly
below
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
The case addressed by commit 5ef499cd571c (cpuidle: menu: Handle
stopped tick more aggressively) in the stopped tick case is present
when the tick has not been stopped yet too. Namely, if only two CPU
idle states, shallow state A with target residency significantly
below
18 matches
Mail list logo