Hi Dan & Zhou,
On 2020/5/28 20:37, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Originally this code rejected any read less than 256 bytes. There
> is no need for this artificial limit.
>
> Also I have changed the snprintf() functions to scnprintf(). The
> difference is that snprintf() returns the number of bytes wh
On 2020/5/28 20:37, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Originally this code rejected any read less than 256 bytes. There
> is no need for this artificial limit.
>
> Also I have changed the snprintf() functions to scnprintf(). The
> difference is that snprintf() returns the number of bytes which would
> have
Originally this code rejected any read less than 256 bytes. There
is no need for this artificial limit.
Also I have changed the snprintf() functions to scnprintf(). The
difference is that snprintf() returns the number of bytes which would
have been copied if there were enough space and scnprintf
3 matches
Mail list logo