On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:36:55PM +0100, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>
> Herbert, do you prefer to drop the patch series and I send an updated one, or
> does I will send a new patch series for checking the return value of
> sg_nents_for_len() ?
Your patch has already been applied so please send any
On 11/03/2015 02:36 PM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:39:57PM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know that this patch has been queued up, but ...
>>
>> On 10/02/2015 09:01 AM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>>> The qce driver use two dma_map_sg path according to SG are
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:39:57PM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know that this patch has been queued up, but ...
>
> On 10/02/2015 09:01 AM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> > The qce driver use two dma_map_sg path according to SG are chained
> > or not.
> > Since dma_map_sg can handle
Hi,
I know that this patch has been queued up, but ...
On 10/02/2015 09:01 AM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> The qce driver use two dma_map_sg path according to SG are chained
> or not.
> Since dma_map_sg can handle both case, clean the code with all
> references to sg chained.
>
> Thus removing
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:39:57PM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know that this patch has been queued up, but ...
>
> On 10/02/2015 09:01 AM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> > The qce driver use two dma_map_sg path according to SG are chained
> > or not.
> > Since dma_map_sg can handle
Hi,
I know that this patch has been queued up, but ...
On 10/02/2015 09:01 AM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> The qce driver use two dma_map_sg path according to SG are chained
> or not.
> Since dma_map_sg can handle both case, clean the code with all
> references to sg chained.
>
> Thus removing
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:36:55PM +0100, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>
> Herbert, do you prefer to drop the patch series and I send an updated one, or
> does I will send a new patch series for checking the return value of
> sg_nents_for_len() ?
Your patch has already been applied so please send any
On 11/03/2015 02:36 PM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:39:57PM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know that this patch has been queued up, but ...
>>
>> On 10/02/2015 09:01 AM, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>>> The qce driver use two dma_map_sg path according to SG are
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:01:02AM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> The qce driver use two dma_map_sg path according to SG are chained
> or not.
> Since dma_map_sg can handle both case, clean the code with all
> references to sg chained.
>
> Thus removing qce_mapsg, qce_unmapsg and qce_countsg
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:01:02AM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> The qce driver use two dma_map_sg path according to SG are chained
> or not.
> Since dma_map_sg can handle both case, clean the code with all
> references to sg chained.
>
> Thus removing qce_mapsg, qce_unmapsg and qce_countsg
The qce driver use two dma_map_sg path according to SG are chained
or not.
Since dma_map_sg can handle both case, clean the code with all
references to sg chained.
Thus removing qce_mapsg, qce_unmapsg and qce_countsg functions.
Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin
---
drivers/crypto/qce/ablkcipher.c
The qce driver use two dma_map_sg path according to SG are chained
or not.
Since dma_map_sg can handle both case, clean the code with all
references to sg chained.
Thus removing qce_mapsg, qce_unmapsg and qce_countsg functions.
Signed-off-by: LABBE Corentin
---
12 matches
Mail list logo