Re: [PATCH] cxl: don't manipulate the mm.mm_users field directly

2021-03-30 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 18:44:05 +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote: > It is better to rely on the API provided by the MM layer instead of > directly manipulating the mm_users field. Applied to powerpc/next. [1/1] cxl: don't manipulate the mm.mm_users field directly

Re: [PATCH] cxl: don't manipulate the mm.mm_users field directly

2021-03-11 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 11/3/21 4:44 am, Laurent Dufour wrote: It is better to rely on the API provided by the MM layer instead of directly manipulating the mm_users field. Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour LGTM, thanks for picking this up Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan -- Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL

Re: [PATCH] cxl: don't manipulate the mm.mm_users field directly

2021-03-10 Thread Frederic Barrat
On 10/03/2021 18:44, Laurent Dufour wrote: It is better to rely on the API provided by the MM layer instead of directly manipulating the mm_users field. Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- Thanks! Acked-by: Frederic Barrat drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

[PATCH] cxl: don't manipulate the mm.mm_users field directly

2021-03-10 Thread Laurent Dufour
It is better to rely on the API provided by the MM layer instead of directly manipulating the mm_users field. Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c index