On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 18:44:05 +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> It is better to rely on the API provided by the MM layer instead of
> directly manipulating the mm_users field.
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/1] cxl: don't manipulate the mm.mm_users field directly
On 11/3/21 4:44 am, Laurent Dufour wrote:
It is better to rely on the API provided by the MM layer instead of
directly manipulating the mm_users field.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour
LGTM, thanks for picking this up
Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL
On 10/03/2021 18:44, Laurent Dufour wrote:
It is better to rely on the API provided by the MM layer instead of
directly manipulating the mm_users field.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour
---
Thanks!
Acked-by: Frederic Barrat
drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
It is better to rely on the API provided by the MM layer instead of
directly manipulating the mm_users field.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour
---
drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/fault.c
index
4 matches
Mail list logo