Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-25 Thread Paul Gortmaker
Hi Andrzej, Some hopefully useful/constructive feedback: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > +static char version[] > +#ifdef MODULE > + __initdata > +#else > + __devinitdata > +#endif > + = KERN_INFO RTL8139_DRIVER_NAME "\n"; This doesn't look right. If defined(MODULE) then

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-25 Thread Paul Gortmaker
Hi Andrzej, Some hopefully useful/constructive feedback: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: +static char version[] +#ifdef MODULE + __initdata +#else + __devinitdata +#endif + = KERN_INFO RTL8139_DRIVER_NAME \n; This doesn't look right. If defined(MODULE) then __initdata

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-24 Thread Rasmus Andersen
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:00:20AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: [...] > > Fine. But: > > At 3:02 AM +0200 2001-05-24, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > >-printk(version); > >+#ifdef MODULE > >+printk("s", version); > > printed_version = 1; > >+#endif /* MODULE */ > > ...is playing

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-24 Thread Alan Cox
> > - printk(version); > > + printk("%s", version); > > > Could you please explain the purpose of this change? To me it looks less > efficient in both performance and memory usage. its called 'programming in C not taking ugly shortcuts' > - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-24 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
> Thanks for your impressive clean-up patch. I have a couple of comments > regarding your clean-up of the dmfe.c driver. Thanks for your response. > On Thu, 24 May 2001, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > > @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ > > u32 dev_rev, pci_pmr; > > > > if (!printed_version++)

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-24 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2001-05-24T10:45:25, Tobias Ringstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > if (!printed_version++) > > - printk(version); > > + printk("%s", version); > > > > DMFE_DBUG(0, "dmfe_init_one()", 0); > > > > Could you please explain the purpose of this change? To me it

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-24 Thread Tobias Ringstrom
Andrzej, Thanks for your impressive clean-up patch. I have a couple of comments regarding your clean-up of the dmfe.c driver. On Thu, 24 May 2001, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ > u32 dev_rev, pci_pmr; > > if (!printed_version++) > -

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-24 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2001-05-24T10:45:25, Tobias Ringstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: if (!printed_version++) - printk(version); + printk(%s, version); DMFE_DBUG(0, dmfe_init_one(), 0); Could you please explain the purpose of this change? To me it looks less efficient

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-24 Thread Tobias Ringstrom
Andrzej, Thanks for your impressive clean-up patch. I have a couple of comments regarding your clean-up of the dmfe.c driver. On Thu, 24 May 2001, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ u32 dev_rev, pci_pmr; if (!printed_version++) - printk(version); +

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-24 Thread Rasmus Andersen
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:00:20AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: [...] Fine. But: At 3:02 AM +0200 2001-05-24, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: -printk(version); +#ifdef MODULE +printk(s, version); printed_version = 1; +#endif /* MODULE */ ...is playing it just a little

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-24 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
Thanks for your impressive clean-up patch. I have a couple of comments regarding your clean-up of the dmfe.c driver. Thanks for your response. On Thu, 24 May 2001, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ u32 dev_rev, pci_pmr; if (!printed_version++) -

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
These two patches look generally ok. However, I'm going to hold them in my mailbox for a little while, until two 8139 bug fixes and a tulip bug fix are sent to Linus/Alan. -- Jeff Garzik | "Are you the police?" Building 1024| "No, ma'am. We're musicians." MandrakeSoft | - To

[PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-23 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
And the next (unfinished) part of net drivers cleaning. Except previously mentioned - __init fixes - version fixes - added MODULE_PARM_DESC - removed unnecessary zero initializers it also contains - mbps -> Mbps (8139too) - warning fixes (unused variables) (8139too) - aironet config fixes - PCI

Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
These two patches look generally ok. However, I'm going to hold them in my mailbox for a little while, until two 8139 bug fixes and a tulip bug fix are sent to Linus/Alan. -- Jeff Garzik | Are you the police? Building 1024| No, ma'am. We're musicians. MandrakeSoft | - To

[PATCH] drivers/net/others

2001-05-23 Thread Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
And the next (unfinished) part of net drivers cleaning. Except previously mentioned - __init fixes - version fixes - added MODULE_PARM_DESC - removed unnecessary zero initializers it also contains - mbps - Mbps (8139too) - warning fixes (unused variables) (8139too) - aironet config fixes - PCI