On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:35:56PM -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier
> wrote:
> > On 12-10-05 12:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
> >>> From: "Mathieu J. Poirier"
> >>>
>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 08:35:56PM -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12-10-05 12:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Mathieu J.
On 12-10-16 09:35 PM, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier
> wrote:
>> On 12-10-05 12:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
From: "Mathieu J. Poirier"
Andrew,
On 12-10-16 09:35 PM, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12-10-05 12:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Mathieu J. Poirier
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier
wrote:
> On 12-10-05 12:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
>>> From: "Mathieu J. Poirier"
>>>
>>> Andrew,
>>>
>>> After requesting a number of changes that, to my
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12-10-05 12:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Mathieu J. Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
Andrew,
After requesting a number
On 12-10-05 12:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: "Mathieu J. Poirier"
>>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> After requesting a number of changes that, to my understanding
>> have been implemented, I have not been able to get the
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 07:53:03PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have the same objection as before: using platform device solely for
> > the purpose of passing some data from board code to the driver. Surely
> > there are other ways of passing this bit of data... What about, for
> > example, making
> I have the same objection as before: using platform device solely for
> the purpose of passing some data from board code to the driver. Surely
> there are other ways of passing this bit of data... What about, for
> example, making it an empty weak symbol so that board code could
> override it
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: "Mathieu J. Poirier"
>
> Andrew,
>
> After requesting a number of changes that, to my understanding
> have been implemented, I have not been able to get the attention
> of the subsystem maintainer on this patch.
From: "Mathieu J. Poirier"
Andrew,
After requesting a number of changes that, to my understanding
have been implemented, I have not been able to get the attention
of the subsystem maintainer on this patch.
If there are still issues, I'm open to making changes but I want
to make sure it doesn't
From: Mathieu J. Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
Andrew,
After requesting a number of changes that, to my understanding
have been implemented, I have not been able to get the attention
of the subsystem maintainer on this patch.
If there are still issues, I'm open to making changes but I want
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Mathieu J. Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
Andrew,
After requesting a number of changes that, to my understanding
have been implemented, I have not been able to get the attention
of the subsystem
I have the same objection as before: using platform device solely for
the purpose of passing some data from board code to the driver. Surely
there are other ways of passing this bit of data... What about, for
example, making it an empty weak symbol so that board code could
override it with
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 07:53:03PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
I have the same objection as before: using platform device solely for
the purpose of passing some data from board code to the driver. Surely
there are other ways of passing this bit of data... What about, for
example, making it an
On 12-10-05 12:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Mathieu J. Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
Andrew,
After requesting a number of changes that, to my understanding
have been implemented, I have not been able to
> Please document what button/key combinations those are.
It's taken from the platform data. Most phone devices don't have a real
keyboard let alone an sysrq key so it's device specific button combos in
general that trigger things like power off.
>
> > The first time the key-combo is detected a
Please document what button/key combinations those are.
It's taken from the platform data. Most phone devices don't have a real
keyboard let alone an sysrq key so it's device specific button combos in
general that trigger things like power off.
The first time the key-combo is detected a
On 08/27/2012 02:43 PM, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: "Mathieu J. Poirier"
>
> This patch adds keyreset functionality to the sysrq driver. It
> allows certain button/key combinations to be used in order to
> trigger device resets.
>
Please document what button/key combinations
From: "Mathieu J. Poirier"
This patch adds keyreset functionality to the sysrq driver. It
allows certain button/key combinations to be used in order to
trigger device resets.
The first time the key-combo is detected a work function that syncs
the filesystems is scheduled and the kernel
From: Mathieu J. Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
This patch adds keyreset functionality to the sysrq driver. It
allows certain button/key combinations to be used in order to
trigger device resets.
The first time the key-combo is detected a work function that syncs
the filesystems is scheduled
On 08/27/2012 02:43 PM, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Mathieu J. Poirier mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
This patch adds keyreset functionality to the sysrq driver. It
allows certain button/key combinations to be used in order to
trigger device resets.
Please document what
22 matches
Mail list logo
