在 2020/12/15 20:01, Daniel Vetter 写道:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:01:39AM +0800, Tian Tao wrote:
drm_irq_uninstall should be called before pci_disable_msi, if use
devm_drm_irq_install to register the interrupt, the system will
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:01:39AM +0800, Tian Tao wrote:
> > drm_irq_uninstall should be called before pci_disable_msi, if use
> > devm_drm_irq_install to register the interrupt, the system will
> > call pci_disable_msi first and
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:01:39AM +0800, Tian Tao wrote:
> drm_irq_uninstall should be called before pci_disable_msi, if use
> devm_drm_irq_install to register the interrupt, the system will
> call pci_disable_msi first and then call drm_irq_uninstall, which
> will result in the following
Hi Tian
Am 15.12.20 um 04:01 schrieb Tian Tao:
drm_irq_uninstall should be called before pci_disable_msi, if use
devm_drm_irq_install to register the interrupt, the system will
call pci_disable_msi first and then call drm_irq_uninstall, which
will result in the following callstack.
kernel
drm_irq_uninstall should be called before pci_disable_msi, if use
devm_drm_irq_install to register the interrupt, the system will
call pci_disable_msi first and then call drm_irq_uninstall, which
will result in the following callstack.
kernel BUG at drivers/pci/msi.c:376!
Internal error: Oops -
5 matches
Mail list logo