On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 22:43:49 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:19:25PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:06:54 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:34:25 +0400
> > > Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > > > I've tested that patch
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:19:25PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:06:54 -0700
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:34:25 +0400
> > Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > > I've tested that patch and it really works for me. If you want change
> > > something for
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:06:54 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:34:25 +0400
> Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > I've tested that patch and it really works for me. If you want change
> > something for other hardware or
> > extend range where forcewake is held prease do it in a
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:34:25 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> I've tested that patch and it really works for me. If you want change
> something for other hardware or
> extend range where forcewake is held prease do it in a separate patch.
> This will be good for bisecting new bugs in the
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 08:32:40AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 08:30:09PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
> > exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking
> >
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:44:59AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> The issue I have with the current patch is that it looks a bit like
>> duct-tape since the point where we drop the forcewake references seems to
>> lack justification. The
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:44:59AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The issue I have with the current patch is that it looks a bit like
> duct-tape since the point where we drop the forcewake references seems to
> lack justification. The write to MBCTL itself will temporarily wake up the
> chip, so
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:34:25AM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 09:56:45PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > > Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
>
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 08:30:09PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
> exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking that
> it's extremely busy. After that it never reaches rc6 state.
>
>
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 09:56:45PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> > wrote:
> >>This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
> >>exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 09:56:45PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
khlebni...@openvz.org wrote:
This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
exists since v3.6 Sometimes after
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 08:30:09PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking that
it's extremely busy. After that it never reaches rc6 state.
Bug was
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:34:25AM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 09:56:45PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:44:59AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
The issue I have with the current patch is that it looks a bit like
duct-tape since the point where we drop the forcewake references seems to
lack justification. The write to MBCTL itself will temporarily wake up the
chip, so just
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:44:59AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
The issue I have with the current patch is that it looks a bit like
duct-tape since the point where we drop the forcewake references seems to
lack
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 08:32:40AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 08:30:09PM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking
that
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:34:25 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov khlebni...@openvz.org wrote:
I've tested that patch and it really works for me. If you want change
something for other hardware or
extend range where forcewake is held prease do it in a separate patch.
This will be good for bisecting new
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:06:54 -0700
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:34:25 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov khlebni...@openvz.org wrote:
I've tested that patch and it really works for me. If you want change
something for other hardware or
extend range where
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:19:25PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:06:54 -0700
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:34:25 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov khlebni...@openvz.org wrote:
I've tested that patch and it really works for me. If you
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 22:43:49 +0200
Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 01:19:25PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:06:54 -0700
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:34:25 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 06:52:39PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> wrote:
> > This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
> > exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking
> > that
>
Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
wrote:
This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking that
it's extremely busy. After that it never reaches rc6
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
wrote:
> This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
> exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking that
> it's extremely busy. After that it never reaches rc6 state.
>
> Bug was
This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking that
it's extremely busy. After that it never reaches rc6 state.
Bug was introduce by commit b4ae3f22d238617ca11610b29fde16cf8c0bc6e0
("drm/i915:
This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking that
it's extremely busy. After that it never reaches rc6 state.
Bug was introduce by commit b4ae3f22d238617ca11610b29fde16cf8c0bc6e0
(drm/i915:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
khlebni...@openvz.org wrote:
This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking that
it's extremely busy. After that it never reaches rc6
Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
khlebni...@openvz.org wrote:
This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts thinking that
it's extremely busy. After that it
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 06:52:39PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
khlebni...@openvz.org wrote:
This patch fixes regression in power consumtion of sandy bridge gpu, which
exists since v3.6 Sometimes after resuming from s2ram gpu starts
28 matches
Mail list logo
