Kirsher, Jeffrey T;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; Wyborny, Carolyn; j...@isotope.jf.intel.com;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [linux-nics] [PATCH] e1000: remove unused variables
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:45:13AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hi
@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-nics] [PATCH] e1000: remove unused variables
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:45:13AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most
of this I'm going
Subject: Re: [linux-nics] [PATCH] e1000: remove unused variables
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:45:13AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most
> > of this I'm going t
Subject: Re: [linux-nics] [PATCH] e1000: remove unused variables
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:45:13AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most
of this I'm going to have to check
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:45:13AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
> > this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
> > weekend here in the US.
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:45:13AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
weekend here in the US.
[...]
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
> this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
> weekend here in the US.
[...]
If there were double register reads being replaced with single
On 29.11.2014 00:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Also, if you do a read that is not stored in any return value, the
> compiler is now free to remove that actual read,
This does not apply to reads from iomem (see "volatile" specifier in
readl()).
Regards,
Lino
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On 29.11.2014 00:28, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Also, if you do a read that is not stored in any return value, the
compiler is now free to remove that actual read,
This does not apply to reads from iomem (see volatile specifier in
readl()).
Regards,
Lino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 21:59 -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
weekend here in the US.
[...]
If there were double register reads being replaced with single
Le 27/11/2014 05:07, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 09:59:28PM -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
>> this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
>> weekend here in the US.
>
> if the
Le 27/11/2014 05:07, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 09:59:28PM -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
weekend here in the US.
if the double
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 09:59:28PM -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
> this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
> weekend here in the US.
if the double reads are there for some reason, can you please
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 09:59:28PM -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
weekend here in the US.
if the double reads are there for some reason, can you please let
I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
weekend here in the US.
I'm not sure why you're bothering with an old driver like this, but if
you haven't actually tried this on all the hardware it pertains
these variables were only being assigned some values, but were never
used.
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 142 --
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 3 -
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
these variables were only being assigned some values, but were never
used.
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee su...@vectorindia.org
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 142 --
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 3 -
2 files changed, 66
I'm pretty sure those double reads are there for a reason, so most of
this I'm going to have to check on Monday. We have a long holiday
weekend here in the US.
I'm not sure why you're bothering with an old driver like this, but if
you haven't actually tried this on all the hardware it pertains
18 matches
Mail list logo
