Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Relax condition to trigger reset for ME workaround

2020-05-21 Thread Punit Agrawal
er Duyck >> ; David S. Miller ; >> intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux- >> ker...@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: [PATCH] e1000e: Relax condition to trigger reset for ME workaround >> >> It's an error if the value of the RX/TX tail descriptor does

RE: [PATCH] e1000e: Relax condition to trigger reset for ME workaround

2020-05-21 Thread Brown, Aaron F
kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [PATCH] e1000e: Relax condition to trigger reset for ME workaround > > It's an error if the value of the RX/TX tail descriptor does not match > what was written. The error condition is true regardless the duration > of the

[PATCH] e1000e: Relax condition to trigger reset for ME workaround

2020-05-14 Thread Punit Agrawal
It's an error if the value of the RX/TX tail descriptor does not match what was written. The error condition is true regardless the duration of the interference from ME. But the driver only performs the reset if E1000_ICH_FWSM_PCIM2PCI_COUNT (2000) iterations of 50us delay have transpired. The