Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:07:22PM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
>> Where is largefile issue in ecryptfs.
>
> Thanks for your thorough work on resolving such issues. We will
> integrate your patches and testcases into the next release as soon as
> we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:07:22PM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
> Where is largefile issue in ecryptfs.
Thanks for your thorough work on resolving such issues. We will
integrate your patches and testcases into the next release as soon as
we
Where is largefile issue in ecryptfs.
Even if we want open file on ia32 with explicit O_LARGEFILE, lower_file will
be opened without O_LARGEFILE flag this result in various errors in dmesg
and data corruption.
Testcase:
write 'a' chars beyond 2Gb
# strace ./writer_test root/file
Where is largefile issue in ecryptfs.
Even if we want open file on ia32 with explicit O_LARGEFILE, lower_file will
be opened without O_LARGEFILE flag this result in various errors in dmesg
and data corruption.
Testcase:
write 'a' chars beyond 2Gb
# strace ./writer_test root/file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:07:22PM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
Where is largefile issue in ecryptfs.
Thanks for your thorough work on resolving such issues. We will
integrate your patches and testcases into the next release as soon as
we get
Michael Halcrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:07:22PM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
Where is largefile issue in ecryptfs.
Thanks for your thorough work on resolving such issues. We will
integrate your patches and testcases into the next release as soon as
we get a
6 matches
Mail list logo
