On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 02:51, joeyli wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:47:46PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:28, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch moved the logic of creating efivars mount point to the
> > > registration of efivars abstraction
Hi Ard,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:47:46PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:28, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> >
> > This patch moved the logic of creating efivars mount point to the
> > registration of efivars abstraction. It's useful for userland to
> > determine the availability
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:51:57AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 04:28:33PM +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > This patch moved the logic of creating efivars mount point to the
> > registration of efivars abstraction. It's useful for userland to
> > determine the
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:28, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
>
> This patch moved the logic of creating efivars mount point to the
> registration of efivars abstraction. It's useful for userland to
> determine the availability of efivars filesystem by checking the
> existence of mount point.
>
> The 'efivars
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 04:28:33PM +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> This patch moved the logic of creating efivars mount point to the
> registration of efivars abstraction. It's useful for userland to
> determine the availability of efivars filesystem by checking the
> existence of mount point.
Why no
This patch moved the logic of creating efivars mount point to the
registration of efivars abstraction. It's useful for userland to
determine the availability of efivars filesystem by checking the
existence of mount point.
The 'efivars' platform device be created on generic EFI runtime services
pla
6 matches
Mail list logo