On Wed, 18 Dec, at 05:52:56PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > It's my laptop Thinkpad T420, the screen scolls very fast, I use
> > boot_delay=500
> > to verify it with my patch for moving boot_delay param an early param.
> >
> > Even without boot_delay, there's always a line at bottom with only the
> >
> It's my laptop Thinkpad T420, the screen scolls very fast, I use
> boot_delay=500
> to verify it with my patch for moving boot_delay param an early param.
>
> Even without boot_delay, there's always a line at bottom with only the prefix:
> "efi:"
Update about this issue:
With latest mainline
It's my laptop Thinkpad T420, the screen scolls very fast, I use
boot_delay=500
to verify it with my patch for moving boot_delay param an early param.
Even without boot_delay, there's always a line at bottom with only the prefix:
efi:
Update about this issue:
With latest mainline tree +
On Wed, 18 Dec, at 05:52:56PM, Dave Young wrote:
It's my laptop Thinkpad T420, the screen scolls very fast, I use
boot_delay=500
to verify it with my patch for moving boot_delay param an early param.
Even without boot_delay, there's always a line at bottom with only the
prefix:
On 11/11/13 at 04:13pm, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Nov, at 11:44:29AM, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi, Matt
> >
> > Confirmed, your patch work ok for the pr_cont issue.
>
> Excellent, thanks for testing.
>
> > Actually I mixed two problems in my report, one is there's always one blank
> >
On Sat, 09 Nov, at 11:44:29AM, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi, Matt
>
> Confirmed, your patch work ok for the pr_cont issue.
Excellent, thanks for testing.
> Actually I mixed two problems in my report, one is there's always one blank
> line
> at the bottom of screen, the other is the pr_cont issue.
On Sat, 09 Nov, at 11:44:29AM, Dave Young wrote:
Hi, Matt
Confirmed, your patch work ok for the pr_cont issue.
Excellent, thanks for testing.
Actually I mixed two problems in my report, one is there's always one blank
line
at the bottom of screen, the other is the pr_cont issue. For the
On 11/11/13 at 04:13pm, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Sat, 09 Nov, at 11:44:29AM, Dave Young wrote:
Hi, Matt
Confirmed, your patch work ok for the pr_cont issue.
Excellent, thanks for testing.
Actually I mixed two problems in my report, one is there's always one blank
line
at the
On 11/08/13 at 10:36am, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Nov, at 08:09:06PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > Here is my debug message about the efifb params (all hex values):
> > [0.00] efi fb lfb width: 280
> > [0.00] efi fb lfb height: 1e0
> > [0.00] efi fb lfb base: e000
> > [
On Thu, 07 Nov, at 08:09:06PM, Dave Young wrote:
> Here is my debug message about the efifb params (all hex values):
> [0.00] efi fb lfb width: 280
> [0.00] efi fb lfb height: 1e0
> [0.00] efi fb lfb base: e000
> [0.00] efi fb lfb linelength: a00
> [
On Thu, 07 Nov, at 08:09:06PM, Dave Young wrote:
Here is my debug message about the efifb params (all hex values):
[0.00] efi fb lfb width: 280
[0.00] efi fb lfb height: 1e0
[0.00] efi fb lfb base: e000
[0.00] efi fb lfb linelength: a00
[0.00] efi
On 11/08/13 at 10:36am, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov, at 08:09:06PM, Dave Young wrote:
Here is my debug message about the efifb params (all hex values):
[0.00] efi fb lfb width: 280
[0.00] efi fb lfb height: 1e0
[0.00] efi fb lfb base: e000
[
On 11/06/13 at 09:38am, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Nov, at 05:23:35PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 11/04/13 at 08:58pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > there's below one line shift
On 11/06/13 at 08:49am, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Nov, at 08:58:53PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > > On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > > >
> > > > there's below one line shift problem:
> > > >
> > > >
On 11/06/13 at 08:49am, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Mon, 04 Nov, at 08:58:53PM, Dave Young wrote:
On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
there's below one line shift problem:
ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI
On 11/06/13 at 09:38am, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Wed, 06 Nov, at 05:23:35PM, Dave Young wrote:
On 11/04/13 at 08:58pm, Dave Young wrote:
On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
there's below one line shift problem:
On Wed, 06 Nov, at 05:23:35PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 11/04/13 at 08:58pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > > On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > > >
> > > > there's below one line shift problem:
> > > >
> > > >
On 11/04/13 at 08:58pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > >
> > > there's below one line shift problem:
> > >
> > > ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI 2.0=0xdabfe014
> > > SMBIOS=0xdaa9e000
> > > [
On Mon, 04 Nov, at 08:58:53PM, Dave Young wrote:
> On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > >
> > > there's below one line shift problem:
> > >
> > > ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI 2.0=0xdabfe014
> > > SMBIOS=0xdaa9e000
>
On Mon, 04 Nov, at 08:58:53PM, Dave Young wrote:
On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
there's below one line shift problem:
ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI 2.0=0xdabfe014
SMBIOS=0xdaa9e000
[0.00]
On 11/04/13 at 08:58pm, Dave Young wrote:
On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
there's below one line shift problem:
ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI 2.0=0xdabfe014
SMBIOS=0xdaa9e000
[0.00] efi:
On Wed, 06 Nov, at 05:23:35PM, Dave Young wrote:
On 11/04/13 at 08:58pm, Dave Young wrote:
On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
there's below one line shift problem:
ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI
On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
> >
> > there's below one line shift problem:
> >
> > ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI 2.0=0xdabfe014 SMBIOS=0xdaa9e000
> > [0.00] efi:
> >
> > In fact check efi_y and the
On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
>
> there's below one line shift problem:
>
> ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI 2.0=0xdabfe014 SMBIOS=0xdaa9e000
> [0.00] efi:
>
> In fact check efi_y and the lfb_height should be compared at the begin of the
> loop of
On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
there's below one line shift problem:
ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI 2.0=0xdabfe014 SMBIOS=0xdaa9e000
[0.00] efi:
In fact check efi_y and the lfb_height should be compared at the begin of the
loop of early_efi_write
On 11/04/13 at 10:37am, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Sun, 03 Nov, at 08:16:47PM, Dave Young wrote:
there's below one line shift problem:
ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI 2.0=0xdabfe014 SMBIOS=0xdaa9e000
[0.00] efi:
In fact check efi_y and the lfb_height should be
there's below one line shift problem:
ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI 2.0=0xdabfe014 SMBIOS=0xdaa9e000
[0.00] efi:
In fact check efi_y and the lfb_height should be compared at the begin of the
loop of early_efi_write
Signed-off-by: Dave Young
---
there's below one line shift problem:
ACPI=0xdabfe000 ACPI 2.0=0xdabfe014 SMBIOS=0xdaa9e000
[0.00] efi:
In fact check efi_y and the lfb_height should be compared at the begin of the
loop of early_efi_write
Signed-off-by: Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com
---
28 matches
Mail list logo
