On 05/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/5/11 10:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2017/5/11 7:50, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > I can't see a strong
On 05/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/5/11 10:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2017/5/11 7:50, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > I can't see a strong
On 2017/5/11 10:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/5/11 7:50, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
On 2017/5/11 10:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/5/11 7:50, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/5/11 7:50, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> Hi Chao,
> >>>
> >>> I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
> >>> existing
> >>> function names.
On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/5/11 7:50, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> Hi Chao,
> >>>
> >>> I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
> >>> existing
> >>> function names.
On 2017/5/11 7:50, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Chao,
>>>
>>> I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
>>> existing
>>> function names. Instead, how about keeping the existing one
On 2017/5/11 7:50, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Chao,
>>>
>>> I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
>>> existing
>>> function names. Instead, how about keeping the existing one
On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
> > existing
> > function names. Instead, how about keeping the existing one while adding
> > some
> > page types to deal
On 05/09, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
> > existing
> > function names. Instead, how about keeping the existing one while adding
> > some
> > page types to deal
On 2017/5/9 9:49, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> Hi Chao,
>>
>> I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
>> existing
>> function names. Instead, how about keeping the existing one while adding some
>> page types to deal
On 2017/5/9 9:49, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> Hi Chao,
>>
>> I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
>> existing
>> function names. Instead, how about keeping the existing one while adding some
>> page types to deal
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
> existing
> function names. Instead, how about keeping the existing one while adding some
> page types to deal with log types?
Hmm.. before write this patch,
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2017/5/9 5:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the
> existing
> function names. Instead, how about keeping the existing one while adding some
> page types to deal with log types?
Hmm.. before write this patch,
Hi Chao,
I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the existing
function names. Instead, how about keeping the existing one while adding some
page types to deal with log types?
Thanks,
On 05/08, Chao Yu wrote:
> Split DATA/NODE type bio cache according to different
Hi Chao,
I can't see a strong reason to split meta from data/node and rename the existing
function names. Instead, how about keeping the existing one while adding some
page types to deal with log types?
Thanks,
On 05/08, Chao Yu wrote:
> Split DATA/NODE type bio cache according to different
Split DATA/NODE type bio cache according to different temperature,
so write IOs with the same temperature can be merged in corresponding
bio cache as much as possible, otherwise, different temperature write
IOs submitting into one bio cache will always cause split of bio.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
Split DATA/NODE type bio cache according to different temperature,
so write IOs with the same temperature can be merged in corresponding
bio cache as much as possible, otherwise, different temperature write
IOs submitting into one bio cache will always cause split of bio.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
18 matches
Mail list logo
