Andrew Morton writes:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:31:28 +0900 OGAWA Hirofumi
> wrote:
>
>> a) don't bother with ->d_time for positives - we only check it for negatives
>> anyway.
>> b) make sure to set it at unlink and rmdir time - at *that* point soon-to-be
>> negative dentry matches
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:31:28 +0900 OGAWA Hirofumi
wrote:
> a) don't bother with ->d_time for positives - we only check it for negatives
> anyway.
> b) make sure to set it at unlink and rmdir time - at *that* point soon-to-be
> negative dentry matches then-current directory contents
> c) don't
a) don't bother with ->d_time for positives - we only check it for negatives
anyway.
b) make sure to set it at unlink and rmdir time - at *that* point soon-to-be
negative dentry matches then-current directory contents
c) don't go into renaming of old alias in vfat_lookup() unless it has
the same
a) don't bother with -d_time for positives - we only check it for negatives
anyway.
b) make sure to set it at unlink and rmdir time - at *that* point soon-to-be
negative dentry matches then-current directory contents
c) don't go into renaming of old alias in vfat_lookup() unless it has
the same
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:31:28 +0900 OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp
wrote:
a) don't bother with -d_time for positives - we only check it for negatives
anyway.
b) make sure to set it at unlink and rmdir time - at *that* point soon-to-be
negative dentry matches then-current directory
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org writes:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:31:28 +0900 OGAWA Hirofumi
hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp wrote:
a) don't bother with -d_time for positives - we only check it for negatives
anyway.
b) make sure to set it at unlink and rmdir time - at *that* point
6 matches
Mail list logo
