Carmeli Tamir writes:
> The FAT file system volume label file stored in the root directory should
> match the volume label field in the FAT boot sector. As consequence, the
> max length of these fields ought to be the same. This patch replaces the
> magic '11' usef in the struct fat_boot_sector w
On (11/26/18 21:23), Tamir Carmeli wrote:
> Thanks for the reply and sorry for my noob question:
> Wasn't I supposed to send this patch also to the FAT maintainer, OGAWA
> Hirofumi?
Yes.
> His name wasn't on the get_maintainer output, and I think
> that this specific file isn't listed anywhere un
Thanks for the reply and sorry for my noob question:
Wasn't I supposed to send this patch also to the FAT maintainer, OGAWA
Hirofumi? His name wasn't on the get_maintainer output, and I think
that this specific file isn't listed anywhere under the maintainers
file.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:58 AM
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N
On (11/24/18 17:01), Carmeli Tamir wrote:
> The FAT file system volume label file stored in the root directory should
> match the volume label field in the FAT boot sector. As consequence, the
> max length of these fields ought to be the same. This patch replaces the
> magic '11' usef in the struct
The FAT file system volume label file stored in the root directory should
match the volume label field in the FAT boot sector. As consequence, the
max length of these fields ought to be the same. This patch replaces the
magic '11' usef in the struct fat_boot_sector with MSDOS_NAME,
which is used in
6 matches
Mail list logo
