On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:29:04 +0100
Petr Tesak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've found a bug when executing scripts:
You've found more than that.
> When a script is loaded, load_script() replaces argv[0] with the
> name of the interpreter and the filename passed to the exec syscall.
>
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:29:04 +0100
Petr Tesak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found a bug when executing scripts:
You've found more than that.
When a script is loaded, load_script() replaces argv[0] with the
name of the interpreter and the filename passed to the exec syscall.
However,
Hello,
I've found a bug when executing scripts:
When a script is loaded, load_script() replaces argv[0] with the
name of the interpreter and the filename passed to the exec syscall.
However, there is no guarantee that the length of the interpreter
name plus the length of the filename is greater
Hello,
I've found a bug when executing scripts:
When a script is loaded, load_script() replaces argv[0] with the
name of the interpreter and the filename passed to the exec syscall.
However, there is no guarantee that the length of the interpreter
name plus the length of the filename is greater
4 matches
Mail list logo