On 8/6/2013 2:04 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
On 05/08/13 10:59, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 16:47 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
From: Julia Lawall
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
This patch adjusts the code so that the alignment matches the current
semantics. I have no
Hello,
On 05/08/13 10:59, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 16:47 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> From: Julia Lawall
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch adjusts the code so that the alignment matches the current
>> semantics. I have no idea if it is the inte
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 16:47 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
>
> ---
>
> This patch adjusts the code so that the alignment matches the current
> semantics. I have no idea if it is the intended semantics, though. Should
> the call to nfs_setsecur
From: Julia Lawall
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
This patch adjusts the code so that the alignment matches the current
semantics. I have no idea if it is the intended semantics, though. Should
the call to nfs_setsecurity also be under the else?
fs/nfs/inode.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1
4 matches
Mail list logo