On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:13:32PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> Am 13. November 2014 11:53:29 MEZ, schrieb Miklos Szeredi :
> >On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Martin Kepplinger
> >wrote:
> >
> >> In this week's -next this should have changed. My SSD broke down so i
> >have to delay further
Am 13. November 2014 11:53:29 MEZ, schrieb Miklos Szeredi :
>On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Martin Kepplinger
>wrote:
>
>> In this week's -next this should have changed. My SSD broke down so i
>have to delay further work for a few days, i'm sorry.
>
>Please be more careful with such patches.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> In this week's -next this should have changed. My SSD broke down so i have to
> delay further work for a few days, i'm sorry.
Please be more careful with such patches. Have you audited all of the
(ca. 200) misc drivers? If not,
Am 13. November 2014 10:40:38 MEZ, schrieb Miklos Szeredi :
>On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Martin Kepplinger
>wrote:
>> The miscdevice core now sets file->private_data to the struct
>miscdevice
>> so don't fail when this is not NULL.
>
>Does it? Look:
>
>static int misc_open(struct inode *
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> The miscdevice core now sets file->private_data to the struct miscdevice
> so don't fail when this is not NULL.
Does it? Look:
static int misc_open(struct inode * inode, struct file * file)
{
...
if (file->f_op->open) {
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Martin Kepplinger mart...@posteo.de wrote:
The miscdevice core now sets file-private_data to the struct miscdevice
so don't fail when this is not NULL.
Does it? Look:
static int misc_open(struct inode * inode, struct file * file)
{
...
if
Am 13. November 2014 10:40:38 MEZ, schrieb Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Martin Kepplinger mart...@posteo.de
wrote:
The miscdevice core now sets file-private_data to the struct
miscdevice
so don't fail when this is not NULL.
Does it? Look:
static int
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Martin Kepplinger mart...@posteo.de wrote:
In this week's -next this should have changed. My SSD broke down so i have to
delay further work for a few days, i'm sorry.
Please be more careful with such patches. Have you audited all of the
(ca. 200) misc
Am 13. November 2014 11:53:29 MEZ, schrieb Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Martin Kepplinger mart...@posteo.de
wrote:
In this week's -next this should have changed. My SSD broke down so i
have to delay further work for a few days, i'm sorry.
Please be more
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:13:32PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
Am 13. November 2014 11:53:29 MEZ, schrieb Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Martin Kepplinger mart...@posteo.de
wrote:
In this week's -next this should have changed. My SSD broke down so i
The miscdevice core now sets file->private_data to the struct miscdevice
so don't fail when this is not NULL.
Reported-by: Giedrius Statkevicius
Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger
---
sorry, I can't read ;) Is this a fix for your problem (instead of the first
patch)?
in case of
On 2014.11.12 18:31, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> The miscdevice core now sets file->private_data to the struct miscdevice
> so don't fail when this is not NULL.
>
> Reported-by: Thierry Reding
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger
> ---
Hello,
Looks like this patch does not solve the problem with
Am 2014-11-12 um 17:31 schrieb Martin Kepplinger:
> The miscdevice core now sets file->private_data to the struct miscdevice
> so don't fail when this is not NULL.
>
> Reported-by: Thierry Reding
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger
> ---
> This is a question: what does this check provide and
The miscdevice core now sets file->private_data to the struct miscdevice
so don't fail when this is not NULL.
Reported-by: Thierry Reding
Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger
---
This is a question: what does this check provide and does overwriting
file->private_data make any difference?
Is open()
The miscdevice core now sets file-private_data to the struct miscdevice
so don't fail when this is not NULL.
Reported-by: Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger mart...@posteo.de
---
This is a question: what does this check provide and does overwriting
Am 2014-11-12 um 17:31 schrieb Martin Kepplinger:
The miscdevice core now sets file-private_data to the struct miscdevice
so don't fail when this is not NULL.
Reported-by: Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger mart...@posteo.de
---
This is a question:
On 2014.11.12 18:31, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
The miscdevice core now sets file-private_data to the struct miscdevice
so don't fail when this is not NULL.
Reported-by: Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger mart...@posteo.de
---
Hello,
Looks like this
The miscdevice core now sets file-private_data to the struct miscdevice
so don't fail when this is not NULL.
Reported-by: Giedrius Statkevicius giedriusw...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger mart...@posteo.de
---
sorry, I can't read ;) Is this a fix for your problem (instead of the first
18 matches
Mail list logo
