Re: [PATCH] generic syscalls: kill cruft from removed pkey syscalls

2016-10-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:18:15 AM CEST Dave Hansen wrote: > > pkey_set() and pkey_get() were syscalls present in older versions > of the protection keys patches. They were fully excised from the > x86 code, but some cruft was left in the generic syscall code. The > C++ comments were

Re: [PATCH] generic syscalls: kill cruft from removed pkey syscalls

2016-10-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:18:15 AM CEST Dave Hansen wrote: > > pkey_set() and pkey_get() were syscalls present in older versions > of the protection keys patches. They were fully excised from the > x86 code, but some cruft was left in the generic syscall code. The > C++ comments were

[PATCH] generic syscalls: kill cruft from removed pkey syscalls

2016-10-17 Thread Dave Hansen
From: Dave Hansen pkey_set() and pkey_get() were syscalls present in older versions of the protection keys patches. They were fully excised from the x86 code, but some cruft was left in the generic syscall code. The C++ comments were intended to help to make it more

[PATCH] generic syscalls: kill cruft from removed pkey syscalls

2016-10-17 Thread Dave Hansen
From: Dave Hansen pkey_set() and pkey_get() were syscalls present in older versions of the protection keys patches. They were fully excised from the x86 code, but some cruft was left in the generic syscall code. The C++ comments were intended to help to make it more glaring to me to fix them