On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 03:45:35PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> There is also the code such as of_gpio_simple_xlate()
> that can't be reused for this, so thus it needs its own xlate
> function and adds some complexity to the code.
> But the convention in of_gpio_simple_xlate() is that
> cell 0 is
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 03:45:35PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
There is also the code such as of_gpio_simple_xlate()
that can't be reused for this, so thus it needs its own xlate
function and adds some complexity to the code.
But the convention in of_gpio_simple_xlate() is that
cell 0 is
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:39:01AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Three cells is rather unusual, is it the best arrangement?
>>
>> Usually it's just offset+flags (your flags are ununsed I see).
>> And then you could divide offset by num
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Rabin Vincent ra...@rab.in wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:39:01AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
Three cells is rather unusual, is it the best arrangement?
Usually it's just offset+flags (your flags are ununsed I see).
And then you could divide offset by num
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 03:59:27PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 00:27 +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ETRAXFS) += gpio-etraxfs.o
>
> GPIO_ETRAXFS is a bool symbol, so gpio-etraxfs.o can only be built-in,
> right?
Right.
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:39:01AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > +Axis ETRAX FS General I/O controller bindings
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +
> > +- compatible:
> > + - "axis,etraxfs-gio"
> > +- reg: Physical base address and
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:39:01AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Rabin Vincent ra...@rab.in wrote:
+Axis ETRAX FS General I/O controller bindings
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible:
+ - axis,etraxfs-gio
+- reg: Physical base address and length
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 03:59:27PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 00:27 +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
+obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ETRAXFS) += gpio-etraxfs.o
GPIO_ETRAXFS is a bool symbol, so gpio-etraxfs.o can only be built-in,
right?
Right.
--- /dev/null
+++
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> Add a GPIO driver for the General I/O block on Axis ETRAX FS SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent
Nice!
(...)
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +Axis ETRAX FS General I/O controller
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Rabin Vincent ra...@rab.in wrote:
Add a GPIO driver for the General I/O block on Axis ETRAX FS SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent ra...@rab.in
Nice!
(...)
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+Axis ETRAX FS
On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 00:27 +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +config GPIO_ETRAXFS
> + bool "Axis ETRAX FS General I/O"
> + depends on CRIS || COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on OF
> + select GPIO_GENERIC
> + help
> + Say
On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 00:27 +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
--- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
+config GPIO_ETRAXFS
+ bool Axis ETRAX FS General I/O
+ depends on CRIS || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on OF
+ select GPIO_GENERIC
+ help
+ Say yes here to
Add a GPIO driver for the General I/O block on Axis ETRAX FS SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent
---
.../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.txt | 21 +++
drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 8 +
drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
Add a GPIO driver for the General I/O block on Axis ETRAX FS SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent ra...@rab.in
---
.../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-etraxfs.txt | 21 +++
drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 8 +
drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
14 matches
Mail list logo
