2017-09-22 6:54 GMT+09:00 David Daney :
> On 09/13/2017 07:37 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>
>> This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
>
>
> Although this comment is true for this driver, it is unclear to me if the
> statement is true in the general
2017-09-22 6:54 GMT+09:00 David Daney :
> On 09/13/2017 07:37 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>
>> This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
>
>
> Although this comment is true for this driver, it is unclear to me if the
> statement is true in the general case.
If a driver
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
Patch applied with David's Tested-by.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
Patch applied with David's Tested-by.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On 09/13/2017 07:37 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
Although this comment is true for this driver, it is unclear to me if
the statement is true in the general case.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
On 09/13/2017 07:37 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
Although this comment is true for this driver, it is unclear to me if
the statement is true in the general case.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
Tested-by: David Daney
---
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
Waiting for David to test this patch before applying.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
Waiting for David to test this patch before applying.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Hi David,
2017-09-15 1:59 GMT+09:00 David Daney :
> On 09/13/2017 07:37 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>
>> This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
>>
>
> Have you tested this?
No. I do not have access to this hardware.
It is just, in my
Hi David,
2017-09-15 1:59 GMT+09:00 David Daney :
> On 09/13/2017 07:37 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>
>> This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
>>
>
> Have you tested this?
No. I do not have access to this hardware.
It is just, in my understanding,
.alloc() and .map()
On 09/13/2017 07:37 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
Have you tested this?
I will have to test this on a real system next week before I can really
comment on it.
David.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
On 09/13/2017 07:37 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
Have you tested this?
I will have to test this on a real system next week before I can really
comment on it.
David.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-thunderx.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-thunderx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-thunderx.c
index
This driver implements .alloc() hook, so .map() is not used.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-thunderx.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-thunderx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-thunderx.c
index 57efb25..b5adb79 100644
---
14 matches
Mail list logo