Re: [PATCH] hpsa: fix warning with smp_processor_id() in preemptible

2013-08-12 Thread scameron
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:33:32AM -0400, John Kacur wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > * John Kacur | 2013-07-26 16:42:30 [+0200]: > > > > >Signed-off-by: John Kacur > > >Acked-by: Stephen > > > > ping. > > > > I checked the branches for-next, scsi-fixes, fixes and misc at [0]

Re: [PATCH] hpsa: fix warning with smp_processor_id() in preemptible

2013-08-12 Thread John Kacur
- Original Message - > * John Kacur | 2013-07-26 16:42:30 [+0200]: > > >Signed-off-by: John Kacur > >Acked-by: Stephen > > ping. > > I checked the branches for-next, scsi-fixes, fixes and misc at [0] and I > didn't see it. I'm going to take this for 3.10-rt but please don't lose >

Re: [PATCH] hpsa: fix warning with smp_processor_id() in preemptible

2013-08-12 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* John Kacur | 2013-07-26 16:42:30 [+0200]: >Signed-off-by: John Kacur >Acked-by: Stephen ping. I checked the branches for-next, scsi-fixes, fixes and misc at [0] and I didn't see it. I'm going to take this for 3.10-rt but please don't lose it on its way to Linus :) [0]

Re: [PATCH] hpsa: fix warning with smp_processor_id() in preemptible

2013-08-12 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* John Kacur | 2013-07-26 16:42:30 [+0200]: Signed-off-by: John Kacur jka...@redhat.com Acked-by: Stephen scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com ping. I checked the branches for-next, scsi-fixes, fixes and misc at [0] and I didn't see it. I'm going to take this for 3.10-rt but please don't lose it on its

Re: [PATCH] hpsa: fix warning with smp_processor_id() in preemptible

2013-08-12 Thread John Kacur
- Original Message - * John Kacur | 2013-07-26 16:42:30 [+0200]: Signed-off-by: John Kacur jka...@redhat.com Acked-by: Stephen scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com ping. I checked the branches for-next, scsi-fixes, fixes and misc at [0] and I didn't see it. I'm going to take this for

Re: [PATCH] hpsa: fix warning with smp_processor_id() in preemptible

2013-08-12 Thread scameron
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:33:32AM -0400, John Kacur wrote: - Original Message - * John Kacur | 2013-07-26 16:42:30 [+0200]: Signed-off-by: John Kacur jka...@redhat.com Acked-by: Stephen scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com ping. I checked the branches for-next, scsi-fixes,

[PATCH] hpsa: fix warning with smp_processor_id() in preemptible

2013-07-26 Thread John Kacur
>From 4c01ac362210c38cdbaddd0a75c24c7070e77dfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Kacur Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:06:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] hpsa: fix warning with smp_processor_id() in preemptible section Signed-off-by: John Kacur On a 3.6-rt (real-time patch) kernel we are see

[PATCH] hpsa: fix warning with smp_processor_id() in preemptible

2013-07-26 Thread John Kacur
From 4c01ac362210c38cdbaddd0a75c24c7070e77dfa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Kacur jka...@redhat.com Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:06:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] hpsa: fix warning with smp_processor_id() in preemptible section Signed-off-by: John Kacur jka...@redhat.com On a 3.6-rt (real-time