Re: [PATCH] i2c: at91: fix support of the "alternative command" feature

2016-08-14 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 04:58:26PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > From: Cyrille Pitchen > > The "alternative command" feature was introduced with sama5d2 SoCs. > > Its purpose is to let the hardware i2c controller automatically send the > STOP condition on the i2c

Re: [PATCH] i2c: at91: fix support of the "alternative command" feature

2016-08-14 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 04:58:26PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > From: Cyrille Pitchen > > The "alternative command" feature was introduced with sama5d2 SoCs. > > Its purpose is to let the hardware i2c controller automatically send the > STOP condition on the i2c bus at the end of a data

[PATCH] i2c: at91: fix support of the "alternative command" feature

2016-08-03 Thread Ludovic Desroches
From: Cyrille Pitchen The "alternative command" feature was introduced with sama5d2 SoCs. Its purpose is to let the hardware i2c controller automatically send the STOP condition on the i2c bus at the end of a data transfer. Without this feature, the i2c driver has to

[PATCH] i2c: at91: fix support of the "alternative command" feature

2016-08-03 Thread Ludovic Desroches
From: Cyrille Pitchen The "alternative command" feature was introduced with sama5d2 SoCs. Its purpose is to let the hardware i2c controller automatically send the STOP condition on the i2c bus at the end of a data transfer. Without this feature, the i2c driver has to write the 'STOP' bit into