Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: report OF style module alias for devices registered via OF

On 03/05/2018 04:30 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Is this patch under your radar? Should I keep pushing for it or just give up? > > Applied to for-next, thanks for your patience and your preparational > work needed to get this upstream! > Great, thanks a lot for your help! > We will see in

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: report OF style module alias for devices registered via OF

On 03/05/2018 04:30 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Is this patch under your radar? Should I keep pushing for it or just give up? > > Applied to for-next, thanks for your patience and your preparational > work needed to get this upstream! > Great, thanks a lot for your help! > We will see in

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: report OF style module alias for devices registered via OF

> Is this patch under your radar? Should I keep pushing for it or just give up? Applied to for-next, thanks for your patience and your preparational work needed to get this upstream! We will see in linux-next if there slipped in some new drivers which need fixing, but we have a full cycle to

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: report OF style module alias for devices registered via OF

> Is this patch under your radar? Should I keep pushing for it or just give up? Applied to for-next, thanks for your patience and your preparational work needed to get this upstream! We will see in linux-next if there slipped in some new drivers which need fixing, but we have a full cycle to

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: report OF style module alias for devices registered via OF

Hello Wolfram, On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas > wrote: >> The buses should honor the firmware interface used to register the device, >> but the I2C core

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: report OF style module alias for devices registered via OF

Hello Wolfram, On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas > wrote: >> The buses should honor the firmware interface used to register the device, >> but the I2C core reports a MODALIAS of the form i2c: even for

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: report OF style module alias for devices registered via OF

Hello Wolfram, On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The buses should honor the firmware interface used to register the device, > but the I2C core reports a MODALIAS of the form i2c: even for I2C > devices registered via OF. > > This means that

Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: report OF style module alias for devices registered via OF

Hello Wolfram, On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The buses should honor the firmware interface used to register the device, > but the I2C core reports a MODALIAS of the form i2c: even for I2C > devices registered via OF. > > This means that user-space will never

[PATCH] i2c: core: report OF style module alias for devices registered via OF

The buses should honor the firmware interface used to register the device, but the I2C core reports a MODALIAS of the form i2c: even for I2C devices registered via OF. This means that user-space will never get an OF stype uevent MODALIAS even when the drivers modules contain aliases exported from

[PATCH] i2c: core: report OF style module alias for devices registered via OF

The buses should honor the firmware interface used to register the device, but the I2C core reports a MODALIAS of the form i2c: even for I2C devices registered via OF. This means that user-space will never get an OF stype uevent MODALIAS even when the drivers modules contain aliases exported from