>> Applied to for-current, thanks!
>
> Added stable, too.
>
Thanks Wolfram.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
> Applied to for-current, thanks!
Added stable, too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:34:36PM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
> From 8a4773d0c0df6fe2e816ad37fde30a2d90a1ad31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Josef Ahmad
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
>
> i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:34:36PM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
From 8a4773d0c0df6fe2e816ad37fde30a2d90a1ad31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad josef.ah...@linux.intel.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg
Applied to for-current, thanks!
Added stable, too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Applied to for-current, thanks!
Added stable, too.
Thanks Wolfram.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
>From 8a4773d0c0df6fe2e816ad37fde30a2d90a1ad31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
to/from the bus into the TX FIFO.
For master
Sorry for late reply.
Bad UA configuration. Will resend straight away.
Thanks,
Josef
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> Still can't apply :( Whitespace problems in the patch context :(
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Sorry for late reply.
Bad UA configuration. Will resend straight away.
Thanks,
Josef
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Still can't apply :( Whitespace problems in the patch context :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
From 8a4773d0c0df6fe2e816ad37fde30a2d90a1ad31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad josef.ah...@linux.intel.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
to/from the bus
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:11:38AM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
> From 8a4773d0c0df6fe2e816ad37fde30a2d90a1ad31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Josef Ahmad
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
>
> i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:11:38AM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
From 8a4773d0c0df6fe2e816ad37fde30a2d90a1ad31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad josef.ah...@linux.intel.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg
From 8a4773d0c0df6fe2e816ad37fde30a2d90a1ad31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
to/from the bus into the TX FIFO.
For master-rx
From 8a4773d0c0df6fe2e816ad37fde30a2d90a1ad31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad josef.ah...@linux.intel.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
to/from the bus
> > This driver had a major cleanup meanwhile. Could you rebase your patch
> > on top of my for-next branch? I guess this version should make it into
> > stable?
> >
>
> This patch applies just fine on top of your i2c-embedded/for-next branch.
i2c-embedded? Ah, this one is outdated. Please
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 03:08:59PM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
>> From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Josef Ahmad
>> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
>>
>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 03:08:59PM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
> From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Josef Ahmad
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
>
> i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 03:08:59PM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad josef.ah...@linux.intel.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 03:08:59PM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad josef.ah...@linux.intel.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg
This driver had a major cleanup meanwhile. Could you rebase your patch
on top of my for-next branch? I guess this version should make it into
stable?
This patch applies just fine on top of your i2c-embedded/for-next branch.
i2c-embedded? Ah, this one is outdated. Please check
From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
to/from the bus into the TX FIFO.
For master-rx
8:10 +0100
> >> Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
> >>
> >> i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
> >> to/from the bus into the TX FIFO.
> >> For master-rx transactions, the maximum amount of dat
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 07:05:30PM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
>> >From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Josef Ahmad
>> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
>>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 07:05:30PM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
> >From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Josef Ahmad
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
>
> i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pus
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 07:05:30PM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad josef.ah...@linux.intel.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 07:05:30PM +0100, Josef Ahmad wrote:
From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad josef.ah...@linux.intel.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg
: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
to/from the bus into the TX FIFO.
For master-rx transactions, the maximum amount of data that can be
received is calculated depending solely on TX and RX FIFO load.
This is racy
From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad josef.ah...@linux.intel.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
to/from the bus
It does.
The bug appears with fairly-sized read transactions (in the order of kB)
returning corrupted data.
Josef
> Josef.
>
> This fixes a real bug for us does it not, some failure case with a
> sustained amount of traffic ?
>
>
> Bryan
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
to/from the bus into the TX FIFO.
For master-rx
From a969728248c3b439dc97a69e7dac133b5efa34e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Ahmad josef.ah...@linux.intel.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:28:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c-designware: fix RX FIFO overrun
i2c_dw_xfer_msg() pushes a number of bytes to transmit/receive
to/from the bus
It does.
The bug appears with fairly-sized read transactions (in the order of kB)
returning corrupted data.
Josef
Josef.
This fixes a real bug for us does it not, some failure case with a
sustained amount of traffic ?
Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
32 matches
Mail list logo
