nel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org; Christophe
> JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>
> Subject: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON
>
> 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
> The modified code should b
.org; kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org; Christophe
> JAILLET
> Subject: [PATCH] igb: Fix a test with HWTSTAMP_TX_ON
>
> 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
> The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is
> 1
> and no other possible v
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:47:59PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
> The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is 1
> and no other possible values of 'tx_type' would match the test.
> However, this is more
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:47:59PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
> The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is 1
> and no other possible values of 'tx_type' would match the test.
> However, this is more
'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is 1
and no other possible values of 'tx_type' would match the test.
However, this is more future-proof, should other values be allowed one day.
See 'struct
'HWTSTAMP_TX_ON' should be handled as a value, not as a bit mask.
The modified code should behave the same, because HWTSTAMP_TX_ON is 1
and no other possible values of 'tx_type' would match the test.
However, this is more future-proof, should other values be allowed one day.
See 'struct
6 matches
Mail list logo
