On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:22:19AM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Who is the maintainer? Is it Mark, or I should wait for someone else?
Yes, it's me.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:43:20PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/08/14 17:46, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > I still do not get what point you are trying to make. Could you please
> > provide evidence? Because really, this is the usage I have seen in
> > projects out there all around, including the
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/08/14 17:46, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:08:44PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>>
> That being said, I
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote:
On 01/08/14 17:46, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:08:44PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:43:20PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 01/08/14 17:46, Laszlo Papp wrote:
I still do not get what point you are trying to make. Could you please
provide evidence? Because really, this is the usage I have seen in
projects out there all around, including the
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:22:19AM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Who is the maintainer? Is it Mark, or I should wait for someone else?
Yes, it's me.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 01/08/14 17:46, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:08:44PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>
That being said, I will not have time, nor the motivation to argue
over
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:08:44PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
>> > That being said, I will not have time, nor the motivation to argue
>> > over such a nuance, so feel free to reject the
On 01/08/14 11:07, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:59:57PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
- * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register). If
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:08:44PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > That being said, I will not have time, nor the motivation to argue
> > over such a nuance, so feel free to reject the change.
> Of course, this is just on top of the vim spell
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:59:57PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>
>>>
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:59:57PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
>> >> - * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:59:57PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> >> - * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
> >> + * (e.g. a clear on
On 01/08/2014 10:07 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
- * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
+ * (e.g. a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
This is somewhat outdated
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
>> - * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
>> + * (e.g. a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
>
> This is somewhat outdated
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> - * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
> + * (e.g. a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
This is somewhat outdated orthorgraphy...
signature.asc
Description: Digital
These sentences are not proper English due to the typos. I had initially caught
one of them while trying to understand the regmap feature, and then I just ran
the vim spell checker, and went through all the items that would need to be
fixed for this header file.
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp
---
These sentences are not proper English due to the typos. I had initially caught
one of them while trying to understand the regmap feature, and then I just ran
the vim spell checker, and went through all the items that would need to be
fixed for this header file.
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
- * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
+ * (e.g. a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
This is somewhat outdated orthorgraphy...
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
- * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
+ * (e.g. a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
This is
On 01/08/2014 10:07 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
- * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
+ * (e.g. a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
This is somewhat outdated
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:59:57PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
- * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register). If this
+ * (e.g. a
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:59:57PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
- * (eg, a clear on
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:59:57PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:08:44PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
That being said, I will not have time, nor the motivation to argue
over such a nuance, so feel free to reject the change.
Of course, this is just on top of the vim
On 01/08/14 11:07, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:59:57PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
- * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register).
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:08:44PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
That being said, I will not have time, nor the motivation to argue
over such a nuance, so feel
On 01/08/14 17:46, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:08:44PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
That being said, I will not have time, nor the motivation to
28 matches
Mail list logo
