Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on HAS_IOMEM

2021-03-18 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 24.02.21 17:23, Guenter Roeck wrote: Unfortunately that does not reflect reality, which was the reason for the above two commits. Problem here is that the cost is not paid by the driver authors, but by architectures which don't support HAS_IOMEM, specifically s390. Driver authors tend to

Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on HAS_IOMEM

2021-02-24 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 2/24/21 7:58 AM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > On 24.02.21 15:08, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> I read the commit log of the following two: >> >> - bc083a64b6c0 ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !UML") >> - 334ef6ed06fa ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !S390") >> >>

Re: [PATCH] init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on HAS_IOMEM

2021-02-24 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 24.02.21 15:08, Masahiro Yamada wrote: I read the commit log of the following two: - bc083a64b6c0 ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !UML") - 334ef6ed06fa ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !S390") Both are talking about HAS_IOMEM dependency missing in many drivers. So,

[PATCH] init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on HAS_IOMEM

2021-02-24 Thread Masahiro Yamada
I read the commit log of the following two: - bc083a64b6c0 ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !UML") - 334ef6ed06fa ("init/Kconfig: make COMPILE_TEST depend on !S390") Both are talking about HAS_IOMEM dependency missing in many drivers. So, 'depends on HAS_IOMEM' seems the direct,