Re: [PATCH] input: elan: Fix wrong %p extension

2015-02-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:51:13PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > There's no %px extension. From the context I think the intention was > to dump the five bytes which were not as expected, and for that one > should use %ph. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes Applied, thank you. > --- > I

[PATCH] input: elan: Fix wrong %p extension

2015-02-06 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
There's no %px extension. From the context I think the intention was to dump the five bytes which were not as expected, and for that one should use %ph. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes --- I think the bug is mostly harmless, since the unrecognized extension is simply ignored (and skipped over),

[PATCH] input: elan: Fix wrong %p extension

2015-02-06 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
There's no %px extension. From the context I think the intention was to dump the five bytes which were not as expected, and for that one should use %ph. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk --- I think the bug is mostly harmless, since the unrecognized extension is simply

Re: [PATCH] input: elan: Fix wrong %p extension

2015-02-06 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:51:13PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: There's no %px extension. From the context I think the intention was to dump the five bytes which were not as expected, and for that one should use %ph. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk Applied, thank