On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:51:13PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> There's no %px extension. From the context I think the intention was
> to dump the five bytes which were not as expected, and for that one
> should use %ph.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes
Applied, thank you.
> ---
> I
There's no %px extension. From the context I think the intention was
to dump the five bytes which were not as expected, and for that one
should use %ph.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes
---
I think the bug is mostly harmless, since the unrecognized extension
is simply ignored (and skipped over),
There's no %px extension. From the context I think the intention was
to dump the five bytes which were not as expected, and for that one
should use %ph.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk
---
I think the bug is mostly harmless, since the unrecognized extension
is simply
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:51:13PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
There's no %px extension. From the context I think the intention was
to dump the five bytes which were not as expected, and for that one
should use %ph.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Applied, thank
4 matches
Mail list logo