Re: [PATCH] input: pegasus_notetaker - directly include workqueue header

2016-08-25 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:52:05AM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > According to the kernel's guidelines, let's directly include the > workqueue functions we use. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger > --- > I don't know if it's worth it, but I should have included this

Re: [PATCH] input: pegasus_notetaker - directly include workqueue header

2016-08-25 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:52:05AM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > According to the kernel's guidelines, let's directly include the > workqueue functions we use. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger > --- > I don't know if it's worth it, but I should have included this according to > the

[PATCH] input: pegasus_notetaker - directly include workqueue header

2016-08-24 Thread Martin Kepplinger
According to the kernel's guidelines, let's directly include the workqueue functions we use. Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger --- I don't know if it's worth it, but I should have included this according to the guidelines :) drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c | 1 + 1

[PATCH] input: pegasus_notetaker - directly include workqueue header

2016-08-24 Thread Martin Kepplinger
According to the kernel's guidelines, let's directly include the workqueue functions we use. Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger --- I don't know if it's worth it, but I should have included this according to the guidelines :) drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1