Re: [PATCH] input: touchscreen: wdt87xx_i2c: Replace mdelay() with msleep() in wdt87xx_resume()

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:32:16AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > wdt87xx_resume() is never called in atomic context. > It calls mdelay() to busily wait, which is not necessary. > mdelay() can be replaced with msleep(). > > This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. > >

Re: [PATCH] input: touchscreen: wdt87xx_i2c: Replace mdelay() with msleep() in wdt87xx_resume()

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:32:16AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > wdt87xx_resume() is never called in atomic context. > It calls mdelay() to busily wait, which is not necessary. > mdelay() can be replaced with msleep(). > > This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. > >

[PATCH] input: touchscreen: wdt87xx_i2c: Replace mdelay() with msleep() in wdt87xx_resume()

wdt87xx_resume() is never called in atomic context. It calls mdelay() to busily wait, which is not necessary. mdelay() can be replaced with msleep(). This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai --- drivers/input/touchscreen/wdt87xx_i2c.c | 2

[PATCH] input: touchscreen: wdt87xx_i2c: Replace mdelay() with msleep() in wdt87xx_resume()

wdt87xx_resume() is never called in atomic context. It calls mdelay() to busily wait, which is not necessary. mdelay() can be replaced with msleep(). This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai --- drivers/input/touchscreen/wdt87xx_i2c.c | 2