On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 05:21:49PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > Fine with me.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel
> >
> > That means you want me to queue it up?
>
> Yes, feel free to take it into your tree.
Done.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 05:14:53PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:47AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:15:52PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > > > > > Reported-by: Arv
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:47AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:15:52PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > > > > Reported-by: Arvind Sankar
> > > > > Tested-by: Arvind Sankar
> > > > > Originally-by: Ch
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:47AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:15:52PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > > > Reported-by: Arvind Sankar
> > > > Tested-by: Arvind Sankar
> > > > Originally-by: Christoph Hellwig
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> > > > Fixed
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:15:52PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > > Reported-by: Arvind Sankar
> > > Tested-by: Arvind Sankar
> > > Originally-by: Christoph Hellwig
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> > > Fixed-by: Arvind Sankar
> > > Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar
> >
> > This patch loo
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 09:26:37AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/8/19 10:33 PM, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > We must return a mask covering the full physical RAM when bypassing the
> > IOMMU mapping. Also, in iommu_need_mapping, we need to check using
> > dma_direct_get_required_mask to ensur
Hi,
On 10/8/19 10:33 PM, Arvind Sankar wrote:
We must return a mask covering the full physical RAM when bypassing the
IOMMU mapping. Also, in iommu_need_mapping, we need to check using
dma_direct_get_required_mask to ensure that the device's dma_mask can
cover physical RAM before deciding to byp
Hi Christoph,
On 10/9/19 2:51 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:45:15AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
Do you mind explaining why we always return 32 bit here?
See the comment in dma_get_required_mask().
Got it. Thank you.
Best regards,
Baolu
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:45:15AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Do you mind explaining why we always return 32 bit here?
See the comment in dma_get_required_mask().
Hi,
On 10/8/19 10:33 PM, Arvind Sankar wrote:
We must return a mask covering the full physical RAM when bypassing the
IOMMU mapping. Also, in iommu_need_mapping, we need to check using
dma_direct_get_required_mask to ensure that the device's dma_mask can
cover physical RAM before deciding to byp
We must return a mask covering the full physical RAM when bypassing the
IOMMU mapping. Also, in iommu_need_mapping, we need to check using
dma_direct_get_required_mask to ensure that the device's dma_mask can
cover physical RAM before deciding to bypass IOMMU mapping.
Fixes: 249baa547901 ("dma-map
11 matches
Mail list logo
