Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-04 Thread sohny thomas
On Monday 03 February 2014 09:56 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: 4) make flush not remove the fe80::/64 address Least favourable to me. I guess this also woud need iproute change and seems most difficult to do. Why using this command 'ip -6 route flush proto static' isn't possible? Ok I

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-04 Thread sohny thomas
On Monday 03 February 2014 09:56 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: 4) make flush not remove the fe80::/64 address Least favourable to me. I guess this also woud need iproute change and seems most difficult to do. Why using this command 'ip -6 route flush proto static' isn't possible? Ok I

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-03 Thread Nicolas Dichtel
Le 03/02/2014 17:08, Hannes Frederic Sowa a écrit : Hello! On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 04:23:00PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: Le 03/02/2014 08:19, Sohny Thomas a écrit : Actually I am not so sure, there is no defined semantic of flush. I would be ok with all three solutions: leave it as is,

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-03 Thread Hannes Frederic Sowa
Hello! On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 04:23:00PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > Le 03/02/2014 08:19, Sohny Thomas a écrit : > > > >>Actually I am not so sure, there is no defined semantic of flush. I would > >>be ok with all three solutions: leave it as is, always add link-local > >>address (it does

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-03 Thread Nicolas Dichtel
Le 03/02/2014 08:19, Sohny Thomas a écrit : Actually I am not so sure, there is no defined semantic of flush. I would be ok with all three solutions: leave it as is, always add link-local address (it does not matter if we don't have a link-local address on It matters. This address is

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-03 Thread Nicolas Dichtel
Le 03/02/2014 08:19, Sohny Thomas a écrit : Actually I am not so sure, there is no defined semantic of flush. I would be ok with all three solutions: leave it as is, always add link-local address (it does not matter if we don't have a link-local address on It matters. This address is

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-03 Thread Hannes Frederic Sowa
Hello! On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 04:23:00PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: Le 03/02/2014 08:19, Sohny Thomas a écrit : Actually I am not so sure, there is no defined semantic of flush. I would be ok with all three solutions: leave it as is, always add link-local address (it does not matter if

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-03 Thread Nicolas Dichtel
Le 03/02/2014 17:08, Hannes Frederic Sowa a écrit : Hello! On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 04:23:00PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: Le 03/02/2014 08:19, Sohny Thomas a écrit : Actually I am not so sure, there is no defined semantic of flush. I would be ok with all three solutions: leave it as is,

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-02 Thread Sohny Thomas
Actually I am not so sure, there is no defined semantic of flush. I would be ok with all three solutions: leave it as is, always add link-local address (it does not matter if we don't have a link-local address on that interface, as a global scoped one is just fine enough) or make flush not

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-02 Thread Sohny Thomas
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 04:08 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: Le 29/01/2014 07:41, Sohny Thomas a écrit : Resending this on netdev mailing list: Default route for link local address is configured automatically if NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is in ifcfg-eth*. When the route table for the interface is

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-02 Thread Sohny Thomas
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 04:08 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: Le 29/01/2014 07:41, Sohny Thomas a écrit : Resending this on netdev mailing list: Default route for link local address is configured automatically if NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is in ifcfg-eth*. When the route table for the interface is

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-02-02 Thread Sohny Thomas
Actually I am not so sure, there is no defined semantic of flush. I would be ok with all three solutions: leave it as is, always add link-local address (it does not matter if we don't have a link-local address on that interface, as a global scoped one is just fine enough) or make flush not

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-01-30 Thread Hannes Frederic Sowa
Sorry for replying so late... On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:38:47AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > Le 29/01/2014 07:41, Sohny Thomas a écrit : > >Resending this on netdev mailing list: > >Default route for link local address is configured automatically if > >NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is in ifcfg-eth*. >

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-01-30 Thread Hannes Frederic Sowa
Sorry for replying so late... On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:38:47AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: Le 29/01/2014 07:41, Sohny Thomas a écrit : Resending this on netdev mailing list: Default route for link local address is configured automatically if NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is in ifcfg-eth*. When the

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-01-29 Thread Nicolas Dichtel
Le 29/01/2014 07:41, Sohny Thomas a écrit : Resending this on netdev mailing list: Default route for link local address is configured automatically if NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is in ifcfg-eth*. When the route table for the interface is flushed and a new address is added to the same device with out

Re: [PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-01-29 Thread Nicolas Dichtel
Le 29/01/2014 07:41, Sohny Thomas a écrit : Resending this on netdev mailing list: Default route for link local address is configured automatically if NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is in ifcfg-eth*. When the route table for the interface is flushed and a new address is added to the same device with out

[PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-01-28 Thread Sohny Thomas
Resending this on netdev mailing list: Default route for link local address is configured automatically if NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is in ifcfg-eth*. When the route table for the interface is flushed and a new address is added to the same device with out removing linklocal addr, default route for

[PATCH] ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address

2014-01-28 Thread Sohny Thomas
Resending this on netdev mailing list: Default route for link local address is configured automatically if NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is in ifcfg-eth*. When the route table for the interface is flushed and a new address is added to the same device with out removing linklocal addr, default route for