Re: [PATCH] irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2: Remove unused function

2018-03-11 Thread Marc Zyngier
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 20:31:27 +, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > I'll queue this up for -rc2, with this addition: > > > > Fixes: e324c4dc4a59 ("irqchip/imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup > > sources") > > It seems this on

Re: [PATCH] irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2: Remove unused function

2018-03-10 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Marc, On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > I'll queue this up for -rc2, with this addition: > > Fixes: e324c4dc4a59 ("irqchip/imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup > sources") It seems this one got missed? Thanks

Re: [PATCH] irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2: Remove unused function

2018-02-12 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 12/02/18 13:12, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam > > imx_gpcv2_get_wakeup_source() is not used anywhere, so remove it. > > This fixes the following sparse warning: > > drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c:34:5: warning: symbol > 'imx_gpcv2_get_wakeup_source' was not declared. Should it

[PATCH] irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2: Remove unused function

2018-02-12 Thread Fabio Estevam
From: Fabio Estevam imx_gpcv2_get_wakeup_source() is not used anywhere, so remove it. This fixes the following sparse warning: drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c:34:5: warning: symbol 'imx_gpcv2_get_wakeup_source' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- drivers/