On 05/09/2015 02:06 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
The irq chip functions use the irq chipdata directly as the base register
address of the controller, so this should be passed in instead of a pointer
to the array address holding the base address.
This fixes Tegra20 CPUidle as now the un-/masking of
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 10:06:54PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> The irq chip functions use the irq chipdata directly as the base register
> address of the controller, so this should be passed in instead of a pointer
> to the array address holding the base address.
>
> This fixes Tegra20 CPUidle as
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 10:06:54PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
The irq chip functions use the irq chipdata directly as the base register
address of the controller, so this should be passed in instead of a pointer
to the array address holding the base address.
This fixes Tegra20 CPUidle as now
On 05/09/2015 02:06 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
The irq chip functions use the irq chipdata directly as the base register
address of the controller, so this should be passed in instead of a pointer
to the array address holding the base address.
This fixes Tegra20 CPUidle as now the un-/masking of
The irq chip functions use the irq chipdata directly as the base register
address of the controller, so this should be passed in instead of a pointer
to the array address holding the base address.
This fixes Tegra20 CPUidle as now the un-/masking of IRQs at the LIC level
works again, but more
The irq chip functions use the irq chipdata directly as the base register
address of the controller, so this should be passed in instead of a pointer
to the array address holding the base address.
This fixes Tegra20 CPUidle as now the un-/masking of IRQs at the LIC level
works again, but more
6 matches
Mail list logo