From: Jesper Juhl
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:25:27 +0200 (CEST)
> Not really a problem, but nice IMHO; the Coverity static analyzer
> complains that we use the pointer 'e' after it has been freed, so move
> the freeing below the final use, even if that use is just using the
> value of the pointer
From: Jesper Juhl j...@chaosbits.net
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:25:27 +0200 (CEST)
Not really a problem, but nice IMHO; the Coverity static analyzer
complains that we use the pointer 'e' after it has been freed, so move
the freeing below the final use, even if that use is just using the
value
Not really a problem, but nice IMHO; the Coverity static analyzer
complains that we use the pointer 'e' after it has been freed, so move
the freeing below the final use, even if that use is just using the
value of the pointer and not actually dereferencing it.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
---
Not really a problem, but nice IMHO; the Coverity static analyzer
complains that we use the pointer 'e' after it has been freed, so move
the freeing below the final use, even if that use is just using the
value of the pointer and not actually dereferencing it.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl
4 matches
Mail list logo