On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:00 AM, ethan zhao wrote:
> Alexander,
>
>
> On 2016/5/17 0:09, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:59 PM, ethan zhao wrote:
>>>
>>> Alexander,
>>>
>>> On 2016/5/14 0:46, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Ethan Zhao
>>>
Alexander,
On 2016/5/17 0:09, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:59 PM, ethan zhao wrote:
Alexander,
On 2016/5/14 0:46, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Ethan Zhao
wrote:
Allocating 64 Tx/Rx as default doesn't benefit perfomrnace when less
CPUs were as
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 14:56 +0900, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> Allocating 64 Tx/Rx as default doesn't benefit perfomrnace when less
> CPUs were assigned. especially when DCB is enabled, so we should take
> num_online_cpus() as top limit, and aslo to make sure every TC has
> at least one queue, take the MAX
[...]
>>> ixgbe_main.c. All you are doing with this patch is denying the user
>>> choice with this change as they then are not allowed to set more
>>
>> Yes, it is purposed to deny configuration that doesn't benefit.
>
> Doesn't benefit who? It is obvious you don't understand how DCB is
> mea
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:59 PM, ethan zhao wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> On 2016/5/14 0:46, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Ethan Zhao
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Allocating 64 Tx/Rx as default doesn't benefit perfomrnace when less
>>> CPUs were assigned. especially when DCB is en
Thanks for your reviewing.
Ethan
On 2016/5/13 20:52, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 5/13/2016 8:56 AM, Ethan Zhao wrote:
Allocating 64 Tx/Rx as default doesn't benefit perfomrnace when less
Performance.
CPUs were assigned. especially when DCB is enabled, so we should take
num_online
Alexander,
On 2016/5/14 0:46, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Ethan Zhao wrote:
Allocating 64 Tx/Rx as default doesn't benefit perfomrnace when less
CPUs were assigned. especially when DCB is enabled, so we should take
num_online_cpus() as top limit, and aslo to make s
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> Allocating 64 Tx/Rx as default doesn't benefit perfomrnace when less
> CPUs were assigned. especially when DCB is enabled, so we should take
> num_online_cpus() as top limit, and aslo to make sure every TC has
> at least one queue, take the MAX
Hello.
On 5/13/2016 8:56 AM, Ethan Zhao wrote:
Allocating 64 Tx/Rx as default doesn't benefit perfomrnace when less
Performance.
CPUs were assigned. especially when DCB is enabled, so we should take
num_online_cpus() as top limit, and aslo to make sure every TC has
Also.
at least
Allocating 64 Tx/Rx as default doesn't benefit perfomrnace when less
CPUs were assigned. especially when DCB is enabled, so we should take
num_online_cpus() as top limit, and aslo to make sure every TC has
at least one queue, take the MAX_TRAFFIC_CLASS as bottom limit of queues
number.
Signed-off-
10 matches
Mail list logo
