Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

> > Sure. But in fact I was not able to create the .ll from .S and neither > create the .s > from the .S in some assembly files on kernel. Do you know how it works? make arch/x86/kernel/preempt.s Works for me. Something broke in your setup? Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

1) Can we drop the test for $(COMPILER) here? Yes. 2) And help section should be updated to list .ll too. I will be adding it too. 3) This chunk belongs together with the other chunk. There is no reason to separate .S => .ll and .c => .ll rules. Sure. But in fact I was not able to create the

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

1) Can we drop the test for $(COMPILER) here? Yes. 2) And help section should be updated to list .ll too. I will be adding it too. 3) This chunk belongs together with the other chunk. There is no reason to separate .S = .ll and .c = .ll rules. Sure. But in fact I was not able to create the

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

Sure. But in fact I was not able to create the .ll from .S and neither create the .s from the .S in some assembly files on kernel. Do you know how it works? make arch/x86/kernel/preempt.s Works for me. Something broke in your setup? Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:04:58PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > > +ifeq ($(COMPILER),clang) > > > +quiet_cmd_cc_ll_c = CC $(quiet_modtag) $@ > > > +cmd_cc_ll_c = $(CC) $(c_flags) $(DISABLE_LTO) -fverbose-asm > > > -emit-llvm -S -o $@ $< > > > > Can we drop the test for COMPILER

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

> > > > +ifeq ($(COMPILER),clang) > > +quiet_cmd_cc_ll_c = CC $(quiet_modtag) $@ > > +cmd_cc_ll_c = $(CC) $(c_flags) $(DISABLE_LTO) -fverbose-asm > > -emit-llvm -S -o $@ $< > > Can we drop the test for COMPILER here too? > Do -fverbose-asm make sense when generating .ll files? > It

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:34:37PM -0300, Vinícius Tinti wrote: > Allows kbuild to generate LLVM bitcode files with the .ll extension when > building with Clang. > > # c code > CC=clang make kernel/pid.ll > > # asm code > CC=clang make arch/arm/kernel/calls.ll > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:34:37PM -0300, Vinícius Tinti wrote: Allows kbuild to generate LLVM bitcode files with the .ll extension when building with Clang. # c code CC=clang make kernel/pid.ll # asm code CC=clang make arch/arm/kernel/calls.ll Signed-off-by: Vinícius Tinti

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

+ifeq ($(COMPILER),clang) +quiet_cmd_cc_ll_c = CC $(quiet_modtag) $@ +cmd_cc_ll_c = $(CC) $(c_flags) $(DISABLE_LTO) -fverbose-asm -emit-llvm -S -o $@ $ Can we drop the test for COMPILER here too? Do -fverbose-asm make sense when generating .ll files? It looks like a

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:04:58PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: +ifeq ($(COMPILER),clang) +quiet_cmd_cc_ll_c = CC $(quiet_modtag) $@ +cmd_cc_ll_c = $(CC) $(c_flags) $(DISABLE_LTO) -fverbose-asm -emit-llvm -S -o $@ $ Can we drop the test for COMPILER here too? Do

[PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

Allows kbuild to generate LLVM bitcode files with the .ll extension when building with Clang. # c code CC=clang make kernel/pid.ll # asm code CC=clang make arch/arm/kernel/calls.ll Signed-off-by: Vinícius Tinti Signed-off-by: Behan Webster --- Makefile | 7 +++

[PATCH] kbuild: add support to generate LLVM bitcode files

Allows kbuild to generate LLVM bitcode files with the .ll extension when building with Clang. # c code CC=clang make kernel/pid.ll # asm code CC=clang make arch/arm/kernel/calls.ll Signed-off-by: Vinícius Tinti viniciusti...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Behan Webster