Re: [PATCH] kcsan: Prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test

2020-06-03 Thread Marco Elver
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 22:48, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > > Instead of __no_kcsan_or_inline, prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test -- > > this is in case we decide to remove __no_kcsan_or_inline. > > > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra > >

Re: [PATCH] kcsan: Prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test

2020-06-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > Instead of __no_kcsan_or_inline, prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test -- > this is in case we decide to remove __no_kcsan_or_inline. > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver > --- > > Hi Paul, > > This is to

Re: [PATCH] kcsan: Prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test

2020-06-02 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > Instead of __no_kcsan_or_inline, prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test -- > this is in case we decide to remove __no_kcsan_or_inline. > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver > --- > > Hi Paul, > > This is to

[PATCH] kcsan: Prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test

2020-06-02 Thread Marco Elver
Instead of __no_kcsan_or_inline, prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test -- this is in case we decide to remove __no_kcsan_or_inline. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Marco Elver --- Hi Paul, This is to prepare eventual removal of __no_kcsan_or_inline, and avoid a series that doesn't