On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 22:48, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > Instead of __no_kcsan_or_inline, prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test --
> > this is in case we decide to remove __no_kcsan_or_inline.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra
> >
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> Instead of __no_kcsan_or_inline, prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test --
> this is in case we decide to remove __no_kcsan_or_inline.
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver
> ---
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> This is to
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> Instead of __no_kcsan_or_inline, prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test --
> this is in case we decide to remove __no_kcsan_or_inline.
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver
> ---
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> This is to
Instead of __no_kcsan_or_inline, prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test --
this is in case we decide to remove __no_kcsan_or_inline.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver
---
Hi Paul,
This is to prepare eventual removal of __no_kcsan_or_inline, and avoid a
series that doesn't
4 matches
Mail list logo