On 08/27/2013 02:22 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 08/27/2013 01:12 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Chen Gang writes:
>>> If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
>>> improved (at least, it is not quite well to hard code the architecture
>>> related code in "kernel/" and "usr/"
On 08/27/2013 01:12 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Chen Gang writes:
>> If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
>> improved (at least, it is not quite well to hard code the architecture
>> related code in "kernel/" and "usr/" sub-directory).
>>
>> But it seems, I have no
On 08/27/2013 01:12 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Chen Gang gang.c...@asianux.com writes:
If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
improved (at least, it is not quite well to hard code the architecture
related code in kernel/ and usr/ sub-directory).
But it seems, I have
On 08/27/2013 02:22 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 08/27/2013 01:12 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Chen Gang gang.c...@asianux.com writes:
If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
improved (at least, it is not quite well to hard code the architecture
related code in kernel/ and
Chen Gang writes:
> If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
> improved (at least, it is not quite well to hard code the architecture
> related code in "kernel/" and "usr/" sub-directory).
>
> But it seems, I have no right to add or move files, so welcome any
> members
After check binutils-2.22 source code, can pass "-no-warn-mismatch" to
'ld' to avoid this error.
I will send patch v2 for it.
:-)
On 08/27/2013 10:14 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 08/26/2013 06:46 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
>>
On 08/26/2013 06:46 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
> improved (at least, it is not quite well to hard code the architecture
> related code in "kernel/" and "usr/" sub-directory).
>
> But it seems, I have no right to add or move files,
If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
improved (at least, it is not quite well to hard code the architecture
related code in "kernel/" and "usr/" sub-directory).
But it seems, I have no right to add or move files, so welcome any
members help do it.
And welcome any
Need add related prefix for h8300, or can not pass compiling by the
latest linker.
The related error (allmodconfig for h8300):
/usr/local/bin/h8300-gchen-elf-ld: h8300 architecture of input file
`usr/initramfs_data.o' is incompatible with h8300h output
/usr/local/bin/h8300-gchen-elf-ld:
Need add related prefix for h8300, or can not pass compiling by the
latest linker.
The related error (allmodconfig for h8300):
/usr/local/bin/h8300-gchen-elf-ld: h8300 architecture of input file
`usr/initramfs_data.o' is incompatible with h8300h output
/usr/local/bin/h8300-gchen-elf-ld:
If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
improved (at least, it is not quite well to hard code the architecture
related code in kernel/ and usr/ sub-directory).
But it seems, I have no right to add or move files, so welcome any
members help do it.
And welcome any
On 08/26/2013 06:46 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
improved (at least, it is not quite well to hard code the architecture
related code in kernel/ and usr/ sub-directory).
But it seems, I have no right to add or move files, so welcome
After check binutils-2.22 source code, can pass -no-warn-mismatch to
'ld' to avoid this error.
I will send patch v2 for it.
:-)
On 08/27/2013 10:14 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 08/26/2013 06:46 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
improved (at
Chen Gang gang.c...@asianux.com writes:
If this implementation is correct, the implementation still can be
improved (at least, it is not quite well to hard code the architecture
related code in kernel/ and usr/ sub-directory).
But it seems, I have no right to add or move files, so welcome any
14 matches
Mail list logo
